Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade werkzeug from 2.2.3 to 3.1.4 #1

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
RemyLoveLogicAI wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade werkzeug from 2.2.3 to 3.1.4 #1

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion omnitool/omnibox/vm/win11setup/setupscripts/server/requirements.txt
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
flask
PyAutoGUI
PyAutoGUI
werkzeug>=3.1.4 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot Dec 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

Pinning werkzeug to version 3.1.4 or higher is a good step to resolve the security vulnerability. However, this is a major version upgrade from the previously used Werkzeug 2.x. This major version bump can introduce breaking changes.

Since flask is not pinned in this file, pip will likely upgrade it to a new major version (3.x) to maintain compatibility with Werkzeug 3.x. This introduces further risk of breaking changes that could affect your application.

For better reproducibility and to avoid unexpected updates, it's recommended to pin to an exact version instead of using >=.1

While the Flask application in main.py seems simple and may not be affected, it's highly recommended to thoroughly test the application after applying this change.

werkzeug==3.1.4 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability

Rules References

Footnotes

  1. Pinning dependencies to exact versions ensures that builds are reproducible and prevents unexpected breakages from automatic upgrades of transitive dependencies. It is a best practice for production applications. ↩

@sentry sentry Bot Dec 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bug: Flask 2.2.5 is incompatible with Werkzeug 3.1.4 due to breaking changes in Werkzeug 3.0+, causing server crashes.
Severity: CRITICAL | Confidence: High

🔍 Detailed Analysis

The Flask server will crash due to an incompatibility between Flask 2.2.5 and Werkzeug 3.1.4. Flask 2.2.5 is not compatible with Werkzeug 3.0.0 or higher, as Werkzeug 3.0+ introduced numerous breaking changes affecting core Flask APIs like request.json, jsonify(), and send_file(). The current requirements.txt pins werkzeug>=3.1.4 while flask defaults to 2.2.5, leading to a runtime crash when Flask attempts to use incompatible Werkzeug interfaces.

💡 Suggested Fix

Either pin Werkzeug to a 2.x version (e.g., werkzeug>=2.2.2,<3.0) or upgrade Flask to 3.0+ to match Werkzeug 3.1.4.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agent 
Review the code at the location below. A potential bug has been identified by an AI
agent.
Verify if this is a real issue. If it is, propose a fix; if not, explain why it's not
valid.

Location: omnitool/omnibox/vm/win11setup/setupscripts/server/requirements.txt#L3

Potential issue: The Flask server will crash due to an incompatibility between `Flask
2.2.5` and `Werkzeug 3.1.4`. `Flask 2.2.5` is not compatible with `Werkzeug 3.0.0` or
higher, as `Werkzeug 3.0+` introduced numerous breaking changes affecting core Flask
APIs like `request.json`, `jsonify()`, and `send_file()`. The current `requirements.txt`
pins `werkzeug>=3.1.4` while `flask` defaults to `2.2.5`, leading to a runtime crash
when Flask attempts to use incompatible Werkzeug interfaces.

Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews.
Reference ID: 4725462