Skip to content

Conversation

Rohit3523
Copy link
Collaborator

@Rohit3523 Rohit3523 commented Oct 11, 2025

Proposed changes

Issue(s)

https://rocketchat.atlassian.net/browse/COMM-40

How to test or reproduce

Screenshots

Types of changes

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Improvement (non-breaking change which improves a current function)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Documentation update (if none of the other choices apply)

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
  • I have signed the CLA
  • Lint and unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if applicable)
  • I have added necessary documentation (if applicable)
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

Further comments

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated an underlying data persistence library to the latest patch release to maintain compatibility with upstream changes.
    • Incorporates upstream improvements that may enhance stability and performance in certain scenarios.
    • Ensures the project stays aligned with current ecosystem expectations and tooling.
    • No user-facing behavior changes are expected; this is a maintenance update aimed at reliability and long-term support.

@Rohit3523 Rohit3523 temporarily deployed to approve_e2e_testing October 11, 2025 15:16 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 11, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Review was skipped due to path filters

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • ios/Podfile.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock

CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including **/dist/** will override the default block on the dist directory, by removing the pattern from both the lists.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

Updates the package.json dependency for @nozbe/watermelondb from ^0.28.0 to ^0.28.1-0.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Dependency bump
package.json
Updated dependency version: @nozbe/watermelondb^0.28.1-0 (from ^0.28.0).

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

A hop, a bump, a tidy tune,
I nibble versions by the moon.
From zero-eight to one-dash-oh,
The garden grows—dependencies glow.
Carrot commits and lettuce logs,
Ship it swift, says this spry hog… er, rabbit! 🥕🐇

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title succinctly describes the primary change of upgrading WatermelonDB to version 0.28.1-0 and correctly uses the “chore” prefix to indicate a maintenance update. It directly references the dependency being updated and the exact version number, giving clear context without extraneous detail. The phrasing is concise and follows conventional commit style, making it immediately understandable to reviewers. There is no vague or generic language and the title aligns precisely with the changes in package.json.
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Member

@diegolmello diegolmello left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While it's not officially released, WatermelonDB's author mentioned it's safe Nozbe/WatermelonDB#1923 (comment)

@diegolmello diegolmello changed the title chore: update watermelon db chore: Update WatermelonDB to 0.28.1-0 Oct 14, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Disabled knowledge base sources:

  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 53e26da and 3c4c4c0.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (1 hunks)

"@hookform/resolvers": "^2.9.10",
"@notifee/react-native": "7.8.2",
"@nozbe/watermelondb": "^0.28.0",
"@nozbe/watermelondb": "^0.28.1-0",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Update the lockfile to make this bump real.

With Yarn 1, changing package.json alone won’t alter the installed version; yarn.lock still pins @nozbe/watermelondb to the previous release. Please run yarn install (or yarn upgrade @nozbe/watermelondb@^0.28.1-0) and commit the updated lockfile so CI and other devs actually receive the new build.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In package.json around line 39, you bumped "@nozbe/watermelondb" but did not
update the lockfile; with Yarn v1 the installed version is still pinned in
yarn.lock. Run yarn install (or yarn upgrade @nozbe/watermelondb@^0.28.1-0) to
regenerate yarn.lock, verify the new version is reflected, and commit the
updated yarn.lock alongside this package.json change so CI and other developers
receive the upgraded dependency.

@Rohit3523 Rohit3523 requested a review from diegolmello October 15, 2025 14:18
@Rohit3523 Rohit3523 requested a deployment to approve_e2e_testing October 15, 2025 14:18 — with GitHub Actions Waiting
@Rohit3523 Rohit3523 requested a deployment to experimental_ios_build October 15, 2025 14:22 — with GitHub Actions Waiting
@Rohit3523 Rohit3523 requested a deployment to experimental_android_build October 15, 2025 14:22 — with GitHub Actions Waiting
@Rohit3523 Rohit3523 requested a deployment to official_android_build October 15, 2025 14:22 — with GitHub Actions Waiting
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants