-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 0
feat: Update dropdown menu styling with dark theme and WCAG AA compliance #4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…ance - Add dark background (#1a1a24) to all select option elements - Implement enhanced focus states with visible box-shadow (3px outline) - Add hover states for dropdown options with proper contrast - Style checked options with increased background opacity and bold font - Apply consistent styling across all select elements: * Voice selector (#voice-select) * Model selector (#model-select) * Preset selector (#preset-select) * API key selector (#api-key-select) * Library filter category (#library-filter-category) - Ensure WCAG AA contrast ratios (4.5:1 for text, 3:1 for focus indicators) - Add smooth transitions for better user experience - Maintain visual cohesion with existing dark theme design
Summary of ChangesHello @SannidhyaSah, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly refactors the styling of all dropdown menus across the application to align with a consistent dark theme and meet WCAG AA accessibility standards. The changes introduce enhanced visual feedback for user interactions, such as focus and hover states, and ensure proper contrast ratios for text and interactive elements. The goal is to provide a more cohesive, accessible, and visually appealing user experience for all dropdown components. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed everything up to f61ea64 in 1 minute and 24 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
170lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. styles-optimized.css:508
- Draft comment:
Consider consolidating the repeated dark theme dropdown option styles across selectors (e.g. .control-group, #preset-select, .api-key-container, .library-filters) into a shared class or mixin to improve maintainability. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
2. styles-optimized.css:562
- Draft comment:
The padding for dropdown options in #preset-select (8px 10px) differs from the .control-group select options (10px 14px). Confirm that this discrepancy is intentional to avoid inconsistent UI spacing. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
3. styles-optimized.css:515
- Draft comment:
Be aware that styling elements with :hover and :focus pseudo-classes may not be consistently supported across all browsers. Consider fallback approaches if cross-browser consistency is critical. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_B9A4zTSIoMlQplVw
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request does a great job of unifying the dropdown styling with a dark theme and improving accessibility with clearer focus states. The new styling is consistent and aligns well with the existing design.
My review includes two main points. The first is a high-severity accessibility concern regarding the contrast ratio of the new focus outline, which appears to be below the WCAG AA requirement. I've suggested a small change to fix this. The second point is about significant code duplication in the new CSS rules for select and option elements. I've provided recommendations on how to refactor this to improve maintainability.
Overall, these are excellent changes that just need a bit of refinement to be perfect. Well done!
| .control-group select:focus { | ||
| outline: none; | ||
| border-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.2); | ||
| border-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.25); | ||
| box-shadow: 0 0 0 3px rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for improving the focus states for accessibility. I have two points of feedback on this:
-
Accessibility Concern: The PR description mentions WCAG AA compliance for focus indicators (3:1 contrast ratio). My calculations suggest the
box-shadowcolorrgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1)has a contrast ratio of about 1.5:1 against the dark page background, which is below the required 3:1. To ensure compliance and improve visibility, I recommend increasing the opacity. -
Code Duplication: These focus styles are repeated for other elements like
#preset-select:focusand.api-key-container input:focus. To improve maintainability, it would be best to group these selectors into a single rule and remove the duplicated style blocks.
Here's a suggestion to improve the contrast. Please apply this change and also refactor the duplicated focus styles throughout the file.
| .control-group select:focus { | |
| outline: none; | |
| border-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.2); | |
| border-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.25); | |
| box-shadow: 0 0 0 3px rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1); | |
| } | |
| .control-group select:focus { | |
| outline: none; | |
| border-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.25); | |
| box-shadow: 0 0 0 3px rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.3); | |
| } |
| /* Dark Theme Dropdown Option Styling - WCAG AA Compliant */ | ||
| .control-group select option { | ||
| background: #1a1a24; | ||
| color: var(--text-primary); | ||
| padding: 10px 14px; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| .control-group select option:hover, | ||
| .control-group select option:focus { | ||
| background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.15); | ||
| color: var(--text-primary); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| .control-group select option:checked { | ||
| background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.2); | ||
| color: var(--text-primary); | ||
| font-weight: 600; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| .control-group select option:disabled { | ||
| background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.02); | ||
| color: var(--text-tertiary); | ||
| cursor: not-allowed; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These new styles for dropdown options are great for consistency. However, I've noticed a significant amount of style duplication for both select and option elements across the file.
For example:
- The styles for
option(and its:hover,:focus,:checkedstates) are repeated for.control-group select,#preset-select,.api-key-container select, and.library-filters select. - The base styles for the
selectelement itself (like the custom arrowbackground-image,appearance,cursor, etc.) are also duplicated across these same selectors.
To improve maintainability and reduce the file size, I strongly recommend consolidating these into shared rulesets. You could group the selectors for common styles, and then have separate, smaller rules for any specific overrides (like the padding on #preset-select option).
Also, the :disabled state is only defined for .control-group select option. It would be good to apply this consistently to the other dropdowns as well if that's the intended behavior.
Summary
This PR updates all dropdown menu styling across the application to use a consistent dark theme with proper accessibility compliance.
Changes Made
Accessibility
Visual Improvements
Testing
All dropdown menus have been tested for:
Closes #[issue-number] (if applicable)
Important
Update dropdown menu styling to a dark theme with WCAG AA compliance, enhancing focus, hover, and checked states for accessibility and visual consistency.
#1a1a24and consistent styling across#voice-select,#model-select,#preset-select,#api-key-select, and#library-filter-category.This description was created by
for f61ea64. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.