Update Application Dependencies

[PSchmiedmayer]

♻️ Current Situation & Problem

Consolidates the compatible updates from #109 and supersedes the stale generated GPU-lock updates in #110 and #111. The GPU runtime remains frozen to its qualified inputs and regenerates without changes.

⚙️ Release Notes

• Update the supported Python and web dependency graphs.
• Qualify OpenHands SDK and tools 1.41.0, including delegate observability and revised bounded stream retries.
• Advance the curated Skill catalog and resolve current npm advisories.

📚 Documentation

No user-facing workflow changes. The strict documentation and versioned deployment builds remain valid.

✅ Testing

• 1,622 Python tests; 92.58% coverage
• Python formatting, linting, typing, dead-code, and fixture checks
• Web contracts, formatting, linting, typing, 127 unit tests, five browser tests, proxy smokes, licenses, and npm audit
• Strict and versioned documentation builds
• Reproducible GPU lock and compatibility matrix

Code of Conduct & Contributing Guidelines

• I agree to follow the Code of Conduct and Contributing Guidelines.

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@PSchmiedmayer, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 54 minutes

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: c5001514-ede3-4a93-909f-4834eb7dd278

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 407eef8 and 7d00fbf.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• packages/gateway/tests/test_specialist_task.py

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request updates Python, frontend, and development dependency pins. It raises the required Node.js version and updates the vendored skills reference. It updates dependency contract and provider failure test expectations. Specialist conversation creation now uses a detached delegation context and propagates delegation identifiers, specialist type, observability metadata, a context link, and the "delegate" tag.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  participant SpecialistTask
  participant DetachedDelegationContext
  participant LocalConversation
  SpecialistTask->>DetachedDelegationContext: create detached delegation context
  DetachedDelegationContext->>LocalConversation: provide delegation metadata and context link
  SpecialistTask->>LocalConversation: create specialist conversation with delegate tag

Loading

Possibly related PRs

• SchmiedmayerLab/heartwood#106: Updates the shared cryptography dependency in packages/audit/pyproject.toml.
• SchmiedmayerLab/heartwood#107: Introduces the bounded specialist task workflow extended by the delegation context changes.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly summarizes the primary dependency updates in the pull request.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description accurately covers dependency updates, OpenHands qualification, testing, and unchanged GPU inputs.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@packages/gateway/src/heartwood/gateway/_specialist_task.py`:
- Around line 101-120: Add unit coverage in test_specialist_task.py for the
specialist LocalConversation creation path, asserting metadata includes the
expected task_id, subagent_type, detached context link, and observability_tags
equal to ["delegate"]. Reuse existing delegation fixtures or helpers and keep
current rejection, resume, interrupt, and typing tests unchanged.

In `@vendor/heartwood-skills`:
- Line 1: Update the vendor/heartwood-skills submodule pointer from the
unavailable commit to the intended commit that exists in the configured upstream
repository, and ensure the recorded submodule status resolves successfully
before submitting the change.

🪄 Autofix

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 901dea35-a8bf-433f-b325-602dce97bf04

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4318438 and 407eef8.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)

• packages/webui/package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
• uv.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock

📒 Files selected for processing (11)

• packages/audit/pyproject.toml
• packages/cli/pyproject.toml
• packages/compliance/tests/test_container_assets.py
• packages/core-adapter/pyproject.toml
• packages/gateway/pyproject.toml
• packages/gateway/src/heartwood/gateway/_specialist_task.py
• packages/gateway/tests/test_provider_failures.py
• packages/persistence/pyproject.toml
• packages/webui/package.json
• pyproject.toml
• vendor/heartwood-skills

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.