Skip to content

chore: adding codeowners #123

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

chore: adding codeowners #123

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ChiefHolland
Copy link
Contributor

Contributor Comments

This PR adds a codeowner to maintain vuln management efforts without hitting a SPF.

Pull Request Checklist

Thank you for submitting a contribution to cookiecutter-python!

In order to streamline the review of your contribution we ask that you review and comply with the below requirements:

  • If you are adding a dependency, please explain how it was chosen.
  • If manual testing is needed in order to validate the changes, provide a testing plan and the expected results.
  • Validate that documentation is accurate and aligned to any project updates or additions.

Don't forget our more detailed contribution guidelines
here.

@ChiefHolland ChiefHolland requested a review from a team as a code owner January 3, 2025 17:56
@ChiefHolland ChiefHolland requested a review from seanctech January 3, 2025 17:56
@ChiefHolland ChiefHolland enabled auto-merge (squash) January 3, 2025 17:56
@JonZeolla JonZeolla closed this May 6, 2025
auto-merge was automatically disabled May 6, 2025 16:09

Pull request was closed

@JonZeolla JonZeolla reopened this May 6, 2025
Copy link

@ai-coding-guardrails ai-coding-guardrails bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work! 😎

We didn't find anything of concern

Reviewed with 🤟 by Zenable

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants