Skip to content

Enhance gesv and posv solvers for complex number support #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 9, 2025

Conversation

TLCFEM
Copy link
Owner

@TLCFEM TLCFEM commented Mar 9, 2025

Enhance the pgesv solver to handle complex number types and improve test coverage by adding tests for PZGESV and PCGESV solvers.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 9, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.4512%. Comparing base (aecd72a) to head (a0eb0ad).

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master         #2        +/-   ##
================================================
- Coverage   99.4904%   99.4512%   -0.0391%     
================================================
  Files            18         18                
  Lines           981        911        -70     
  Branches        120         89        -31     
================================================
- Hits            976        906        -70     
  Misses            5          5                

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@TLCFEM TLCFEM changed the title Enhance pgesv solver for complex number support Enhance gesv and posv solvers for complex number support Mar 9, 2025
@TLCFEM TLCFEM merged commit 1b67b6b into master Mar 9, 2025
5 checks passed
@TLCFEM TLCFEM deleted the feature-complex-ge-po branch March 9, 2025 10:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants