Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update example with larger matrix size and iterative solver implementation #9

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 26, 2025

Conversation

TLCFEM
Copy link
Owner

@TLCFEM TLCFEM commented Mar 26, 2025

Enhance the example to utilize a larger matrix size and adjust solver options. Introduce the LIS header and implementation for the iterative solver.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 26, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.4480%. Comparing base (44bdd7e) to head (cf6c842).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master         #9        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   99.4220%   99.4480%   +0.0260%     
================================================
  Files            30         31         +1     
  Lines          1211       1268        +57     
  Branches         98        100         +2     
================================================
+ Hits           1204       1261        +57     
  Misses            7          7                

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@TLCFEM TLCFEM merged commit 7b4e580 into master Mar 26, 2025
7 checks passed
@TLCFEM TLCFEM deleted the feature-lis-solver branch March 26, 2025 03:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants