Skip to content

Conversation

ransingh
Copy link
Member

What is OAS3.0?

It is latest specification for Open API, which we use for documenting our APIs.
OAS3.0

Why do we need that?

As Open API 2.0 does not support JWT based Authentication on API docs.
We cannot try out the request on the Docs.
Also no point in delivering OAS2.0 when 3..0 is out and is drastically simpler and different from OAS2.0

What are we doing here

This is forked from [OAS3.0] (https://github.com/aadityataparia/rspec_api_documentation/tree/aadi/oas3) because we want to generate OAS3.0 base documentation.

but this is 22 commits behind the master branch from the original author.
Original project is https://github.com/zipmark/rspec_api_documentation.
The original author is not keen to merge the OAS3.0 work into his master.

So we forked from the OAS3.0 work done by a good samaritan and rebased that on top of the master branch of the original author. So we get latest update with OAS3.0

Paulo Mateus Moura da Silva and others added 29 commits August 28, 2018 10:01
…and remove duplicated parameters (generated by the path parameter search: RspecApiDocumentation::DSL.extract_route_parameters!)
…pen-api-parameters

Fix: Issues zipmark#191 zipmark#402 and zipmark#403: Add example property and remove duplicated parameters
…nums-to-api-blueprint

Add parameter/attribute defaults, enums and annotations for API Blueprint
…r-required

Fix Open Api: issue with multiple required fields
…nt-api_template-explanation

Fix zipmark#394 API Blueprint: Add api_explanation in template
When we use `config.disable_dsl_status!` than we can not `expect(status).to eq 200` but we can `expect(status_code).to_eq 200`
Add comment about response_status
Get rid of deprecated .should syntax in readme
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants