Document direct CWMSTable data - #323
Draft
krowvin wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
CWMSTableprop typesWhy
CWMSTablealready acceptsinputTSValues, but the docs only mentioned the prop in the API table and the generated declaration exposed it as requiredany. That made direct data input hard to discover and easy to misuse. A linked Windows docs install also loaded duplicate peer instances until the docs build explicitly deduplicated them.Validation
npx vitest run --maxWorkers=1— 12 files, 44 tests passednpm run build-libnpm run buildagainst the locally linked packagenpm run check-changesetThe repository-wide docs lint command still reports its existing baseline of 92 unrelated problems; the modified docs files pass focused lint.
Screenshots
Desktop
Mobile