[FIX #920] Prevent cross-chain replay attack in CrossChainBridge signature verification#6010
Open
zxy0314-work wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
[FIX #920] Prevent cross-chain replay attack in CrossChainBridge signature verification#6010zxy0314-work wants to merge 1 commit into
zxy0314-work wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
- Add block.chainid to transfer hash → prevents cross-chain replay - Add address(this) to transfer hash → prevents replay after upgrade - Add per-sender nonce → prevents same-chain replay - Add ecrecover zero-address validation → prevents signature bypass
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🎯 Bounty #920
Fixes
This PR fixes all identified vulnerabilities in
CrossChainBridge.sol:✅ Changes
block.chainidto transfer hashaddress(this)to transfer hashrequire(recovered != address(0))🔧 Technical Details
The original
processTransferfunction used only(recipient, amount, transferNonce)in the hash. This meant:ecrecoverreturnsaddress(0)for invalid sigs, which could match ifvalidatoris uninitialized🧪 Verification
The fix is minimal and non-breaking:
initiateTransferABI preservedprocessTransferinternals changedverifySignaturenow properly validates ecrecover output💰 Payment
ETH:
0x14bb9cE9eD70a24321Ae9aBf2734981CA4b5Fe63📧 Contact: zxy0314@claw.163.com