Conversation
WalkthroughThis change introduces the foundational structure for a Vue 3 authentication web application with TypeScript support. It adds core project configuration files, including TypeScript, Babel, Prettier, and ESLint settings, as well as a multi-stage Dockerfile for production deployment using Nginx. The application’s entry point, routing, and state management are established, with initial Vue components for login, signup, error handling, and example views. Two embeddable chatbot widgets are included for integration into web pages. Supporting files for API interaction, error state management, and global type declarations are also added. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Browser
participant VueApp
participant API
participant Nginx
User->>Browser: Accesses app URL
Browser->>Nginx: Requests index.html
Nginx-->>Browser: Serves index.html and static assets
Browser->>VueApp: Bootstraps Vue app (main.ts)
User->>VueApp: Interacts with Login/Signup forms
VueApp->>API: Sends login/signup requests (Axios)
API-->>VueApp: Returns response (success/error)
VueApp->>VueApp: Updates state, navigates, or shows error
sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Browser
participant ChatbotWidget
participant BackendAPI
User->>Browser: Clicks chatbot button
Browser->>ChatbotWidget: Opens widget, displays UI
User->>ChatbotWidget: Sends message
ChatbotWidget->>BackendAPI: Sends API request (fetch/Axios)
BackendAPI-->>ChatbotWidget: Returns bot response
ChatbotWidget->>Browser: Displays bot reply
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![greptile-apps[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/867647?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PR Summary
This pull request establishes a Vue 3 TypeScript authentication application with login/signup functionality, error handling, and API integration.
- Critical security concern: The
strictflag intsconfig.jsonis set to false, which disables important type checking and could lead to production bugs - Potential deployment issue in
Dockerfile: New version removes dynamic port configuration, which may cause problems in cloud environments - Invalid
arrayExpandoption in.prettierrcconfiguration is not a standard Prettier option - Accessibility/SEO issue in
AboutView.vue: Multiple h1 tags violate best practices - Type definition error in
errorStore.ts: Redundant union typestring | stringand missing initial state typing
24 file(s) reviewed, 23 comment(s)
Edit PR Review Bot Settings | Greptile
| "semi": true, | ||
| "singleQuote": false, | ||
| "printWidth": 100, | ||
| "arrayExpand": true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
logic: 'arrayExpand' is not a valid Prettier configuration option. Remove this line as it will be ignored by Prettier.
| "arrayExpand": true | |
| "arrayExpand": true, |
| # Add a startup script for debugging | ||
| RUN echo '#!/bin/sh' > /start.sh && \ | ||
| echo 'echo "Starting nginx with PORT=$PORT"' >> /start.sh && \ | ||
| echo 'cat /etc/nginx/conf.d/default.conf' >> /start.sh && \ | ||
| echo 'nginx -g "daemon off;"' >> /start.sh && \ | ||
| chmod +x /start.sh |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
logic: The debugging script prints the PORT variable but never uses it to configure nginx. This will cause nginx to always use port 8080 regardless of PORT env var.
| # Add a startup script for debugging | |
| RUN echo '#!/bin/sh' > /start.sh && \ | |
| echo 'echo "Starting nginx with PORT=$PORT"' >> /start.sh && \ | |
| echo 'cat /etc/nginx/conf.d/default.conf' >> /start.sh && \ | |
| echo 'nginx -g "daemon off;"' >> /start.sh && \ | |
| chmod +x /start.sh | |
| # Add a startup script for port configuration and debugging | |
| RUN echo '#!/bin/sh' > /start.sh && \ | |
| echo 'echo "Starting nginx with PORT=$PORT"' >> /start.sh && \ | |
| echo 'sed -i "s/listen 8080/listen $PORT/g" /etc/nginx/conf.d/default.conf' >> /start.sh && \ | |
| echo 'cat /etc/nginx/conf.d/default.conf' >> /start.sh && \ | |
| echo 'nginx -g "daemon off;"' >> /start.sh && \ | |
| chmod +x /start.sh |
| # EXPOSE 8080 | ||
|
|
||
| # CMD ["nginx", "-g", "daemon off;"] No newline at end of file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
style: Remove these commented-out duplicates of EXPOSE and CMD directives
| # EXPOSE 8080 | |
| # CMD ["nginx", "-g", "daemon off;"] |
| "pinia": "^3.0.1", | ||
| "vue": "^3.2.13", | ||
| "vue-router": "^4.0.3", | ||
| "vuex": "^4.0.0" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
style: Using both Pinia and Vuex state management libraries simultaneously may cause confusion and bloat. Consider using only Pinia as it's the new recommended state management solution for Vue 3.
| location / { | ||
| root /usr/share/nginx/html; | ||
| index index.html index.htm; | ||
| try_files $uri $uri/ /index.html =404; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
logic: The =404 fallback after /index.html is redundant since the SPA should handle all routes
| try_files $uri $uri/ /index.html =404; | |
| try_files $uri $uri/ /index.html; |
| name: "Login", | ||
| component: LoginPage, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
style: route name 'Login' uses inconsistent capitalization compared to other routes
| name: "Login", | |
| component: LoginPage, | |
| name: "login", | |
| component: LoginPage, |
| api.interceptors.request.use( | ||
| (config) => { | ||
| return config; | ||
| }, | ||
| (error) => { | ||
| return Promise.reject(error); | ||
| } | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
style: request interceptor is empty and could be removed since it's not adding any functionality
| return config; | ||
| }, | ||
| (error) => { | ||
| console.error(error); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
style: avoid console.error in production code. Consider using a proper error logging service
|
|
||
| export const useErrorState = defineStore("errorStore", { | ||
| state: () => ({ | ||
| errorMsg: null as string | string, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
syntax: Invalid type union 'string | string' - should be just 'string | null'
| errorMsg: null as string | string, | |
| errorMsg: null as string | null, |
| "compilerOptions": { | ||
| "target": "esnext", | ||
| "module": "esnext", | ||
| "strict": false, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
logic: Setting 'strict' to false disables important TypeScript type checking features. Enable strict mode to catch type-related errors early.
| "strict": false, | |
| "strict": true, |
Review SummarySkipped posting 7 drafted comments based on your review threshold. Feel free to update them here. Draft CommentsDockerfile:1-20, 45-47Scores:
Reason for filtering: The comment meets the threshold for inclusion Analysis: The issue is about removing commented-out code in a Dockerfile, which has minimal production impact (1) as commented code doesn't affect runtime behavior. The fix is extremely clear and specific (5) - simply remove the commented sections. The urgency is low (2) as this is a code cleanliness issue that doesn't affect functionality. With a total score of 8, this comment falls below the threshold of 10 required for inclusion. public/askSebby-chatbot.js:5-470Scores:
Reason for filtering: The comment meets the threshold for inclusion Analysis: The suggestion to convert an IIFE to an arrow function is a modern JavaScript practice improvement that has minimal production impact (1) as it's functionally equivalent. The fix is extremely specific with a direct code replacement (5). The urgency is low (2) as this is a stylistic improvement that doesn't affect functionality. With a total score of 8, this comment falls below the threshold of 10 required for inclusion. src/components/SignUp.vue:256-276Scores:
Reason for filtering: The comment identifies a legitimate UX issue in the signup flow Analysis: The lack of success feedback or redirection after signup is a moderate production issue that affects user experience but doesn't crash the system. The bug description identifies the problem clearly but doesn't provide a specific implementation fix. This is a relatively urgent issue as users may be confused about whether signup succeeded, potentially causing duplicate accounts or support requests. The total score meets the minimum threshold of 10 for inclusion. src/service/api.ts:10-17Scores:
Reason for filtering: The comment meets the threshold for inclusion Analysis: The empty interceptor has minimal production impact (1) as it's not causing any functional issues. The fix is very specific (5) with a clear comment addition explaining the purpose. Urgency is low (2) as this is more of a code quality/documentation issue than a functional problem. Total score of 8 is below the threshold of 10, but since we're using PERMISSIVE filtering, the comment can be included. src/service/api.ts:19-22Scores:
Reason for filtering: The comment meets the threshold for inclusion Analysis: The issue involves a misleading parameter name in an API interceptor. Production impact is low (2) as the code will still function correctly despite the misleading name. Fix specificity is very high (5) as the comment provides an exact code replacement. Urgency is medium (3) as this is a clarity/maintainability issue that should be fixed for better code readability and to prevent future confusion, but doesn't cause immediate system failures. The total score of 10 meets the minimum threshold for inclusion. src/shims-vue.d.ts:4-4Scores:
Reason for filtering: The comment addresses a legitimate TypeScript best practice issue and provides a specific fix Analysis: The issue involves using empty object notation as a type, which is a TypeScript anti-pattern. While this likely won't cause runtime crashes (production impact: 2), the fix is extremely clear and directly applicable (fix specificity: 5). The urgency is medium (3) as it's a code quality issue that should be addressed but won't immediately break functionality. The total score meets the minimum threshold of 10 for inclusion. src/shims-vue.d.ts:4-4Scores:
Reason for filtering: The comment addresses a valid TypeScript type safety concern and provides a specific fix Analysis: The comment addresses using 'any' type which reduces type safety but likely won't cause immediate production crashes. The fix is extremely specific and directly applicable. While not critical, improving type safety is important for maintainability and preventing future bugs. The total score meets the minimum threshold of 10 to be included. |
WalkthroughThis pull request sets up the foundational structure for a Vue.js authentication app, including project configuration, build scripts, and two embeddable chatbot widgets. It introduces all necessary configuration files, Docker and Nginx setup for deployment, and provides ready-to-use chatbot scripts for integration into web pages. The README is updated to reflect the new project context and usage instructions. Changes
Entelligence.ai can learn from your feedback. Simply add 👍 / 👎 emojis to teach it your preferences. More shortcuts belowEmoji Descriptions:
Interact with the Bot:
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 26
🧹 Nitpick comments (39)
.gitignore (1)
1-24: Looks good – covers the essentials, but consider adding test-/coverage artefactsThe ignore list is comprehensive for Node/Vue projects.
If you plan to add automated tests, also ignore common artefacts such as.nyc_output/,coverage/,playwright-report/, etc., to avoid committing bulky reports by accident.
No changes required right now – just something to keep in mind once tests land.src/service/api.ts (2)
10-17: Request interceptor doesn’t add auth / CSRF headersRight now the interceptor is a pass-through.
If you later store JWTs or CSRF tokens in Pinia/local-storage, attach them here so every request is consistently authenticated.(config) => { - return config; + const token = localStorage.getItem("access_token"); + if (token) config.headers.Authorization = `Bearer ${token}`; + // example: CSRF + const csrf = document.cookie.match(/csrftoken=([^;]+)/)?.[1]; + if (csrf) config.headers["X-CSRF-Token"] = csrf; + return config; },
19-27: Surface errors to the UI, not just the consoleCatching errors and
console.error-ing hides failures from users and breaks UX.Suggestion: forward a trimmed error object to your Pinia
errorStoreor return a normalisedApiErrorso callers can show toast messages.- (error) => { - console.error(error); - return Promise.reject(error); - } + (error) => { + // TODO: mapAxiosError is an example helper that unwraps network / 4xx / 5xx cases + return Promise.reject(mapAxiosError(error)); + }public/chatbot-widget.js (3)
426-457: Cookies for API keys invite CSRF; considerSameSite=strictor move to storageStealing
document.cookieis still a common attack.
If you must keep the API key client-side, store it inlocalStorage+ attach viaAuthorization, and set the cookie asSameSite=Strict; Secureon HTTPS only.
510-533: Draggable only supports mouse – touch devices can’t move the chat windowRough UX on mobile/tablet. Hook
touchstart / touchmove / touchendin parallel.
569-573: Clean-up listeners to avoid memory leaks on SPA navigationIf this widget is used inside a Vue SPA route that unmounts, the global listeners (
mousemove,mouseup) remain.
Provide adestroy()method onwindow.ChatbotWidgetthat removes them, and call it from Vue’sbeforeUnmount.public/askSebby-chatbot.js (3)
337-362: Typing indicator timing is hard-coded
addBotMessageshows a 1 s delay regardless of network latency.
When a real Bedrock call takes >1 s, the user sees the typing dots disappear and then nothing happens until the fetch resolves, making the UI feel frozen.Consider:
- setTimeout(() => { - // remove indicator & render message - }, 1000); + // Remove indicator only when a response string is readyHook the removal to the fetch promise for a smoother experience.
422-435: Prevent duplicate submits & provide loading state
handleSendMessageallows the user to press Enter or click repeatedly, spawning parallel Bedrock calls.Quick fix:
async function handleSendMessage() { const message = elements.input.value.trim(); if (!message) return; - elements.input.value = ""; + elements.input.value = ""; + elements.sendButton.disabled = true; ... const response = await sendMessageToBedrock(message); addBotMessage(response); + elements.sendButton.disabled = false; }Also consider disabling the entire input while waiting.
440-444: Accessibility: rely on “keypress” is deprecatedModern browsers recommend
keydownorkeyup;keypressis now legacy and misses some IME flows. Replace withkeydownand guard one.key === "Enter".src/views/AboutView.vue (1)
3-4: Use semantic heading levels for accessibility
Having multiple<h1>elements can negatively impact document outline and SEO. Consider demoting the second heading to<h2>(or lower) to maintain a proper hierarchy.Suggested change:
- <h1 class="text-3xl font-bold underline">Hello world!</h1> + <h2 class="text-3xl font-bold underline">Hello world!</h2>src/views/HomeView.vue (1)
3-3: Use asset alias import for consistency
Using a relative path in the template can be brittle. Import your logo asset with the@alias in<script setup>to leverage TypeScript and bundler resolution:<script setup lang="ts"> -import HelloWorld from "@/components/HelloWorld.vue"; // @ is an alias to /src +import logo from "@/assets/logo.png"; +import HelloWorld from "@/components/HelloWorld.vue"; // @ is an alias to /src </script> <template> <div class="home"> - <img alt="Vue logo" src="../assets/logo.png" /> + <img :src="logo" alt="Vue logo" /> <HelloWorld msg="Welcome to Your Vue.js + TypeScript App" /> </div> </template>src/App.vue (2)
6-10: Remove or extract commented-out navigation
Commented blocks add noise. If this navigation is planned, consider extracting it into aNavbarcomponent; otherwise, delete these lines to keep the code clean.
15-16: Remove empty<style>block
An empty<style>tag is unnecessary. Delete it or add relevant styles here.src/main.ts (2)
4-4: Remove unused commented import
The commented import ofstoreis no longer relevant. Removing it will reduce clutter.
9-9: Confirm plugin registration order
Although.use(router).use(pinia)functions correctly, Vue's documentation often recommends registering Pinia before the router (.use(pinia).use(router)) to support store-based navigation guards. Consider adjusting if needed.src/shims-vue.d.ts (1)
4-4: Consider using more specific types instead of empty objects.The static analysis tool flagged the use of
{}as a type, which can be ambiguous. While this is a common pattern in Vue type declarations, consider using more specific types if you plan to add props or emits in your components.- const component: DefineComponent<{}, {}, any> + const component: DefineComponent<Record<string, never>, Record<string, never>, any>🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 4-4: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 4-4: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
src/components/ErrorComponent.vue (1)
8-20: Enhance close button accessibility.While you've included
role="button"on the SVG, the parent<span>that has the click handler should ideally have more complete accessibility attributes.- <span class="absolute top-0 bottom-0 right-0 px-4 py-3" @click="onclose"> + <span class="absolute top-0 bottom-0 right-0 px-4 py-3" @click="onclose" role="button" aria-label="Close error message" tabindex="0" @keydown.enter="onclose">README.md (5)
4-6: Add language specifiers to code blocks.For better syntax highlighting and adherence to Markdown best practices, specify the language for each code block.
- ``` + ```bash yarn install<details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)</summary> 4-4: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified null (MD040, fenced-code-language) </details> </details> --- `9-11`: **Add language specifiers to code blocks.** For better syntax highlighting and adherence to Markdown best practices, specify the language for each code block. ```diff - ``` + ```bash yarn serve<details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)</summary> 9-9: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified null (MD040, fenced-code-language) </details> </details> --- `14-16`: **Add language specifiers to code blocks.** For better syntax highlighting and adherence to Markdown best practices, specify the language for each code block. ```diff - ``` + ```bash yarn build<details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)</summary> 14-14: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified null (MD040, fenced-code-language) </details> </details> --- `19-21`: **Add language specifiers to code blocks.** For better syntax highlighting and adherence to Markdown best practices, specify the language for each code block. ```diff - ``` + ```bash yarn lint<details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)</summary> 19-19: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified null (MD040, fenced-code-language) </details> </details> --- `1-25`: **Consider adding more comprehensive documentation.** The README is currently minimal. Consider enhancing it with: - Project description and purpose - Dependencies and requirements - Project structure overview - Deployment instructions (especially since you have Docker configuration) - Contributing guidelines <details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)</summary> 4-4: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified null (MD040, fenced-code-language) --- 9-9: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified null (MD040, fenced-code-language) --- 14-14: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified null (MD040, fenced-code-language) --- 19-19: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified null (MD040, fenced-code-language) </details> </details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/components/HelloWorld.vue (2)</summary><blockquote> `3-3`: **Prefer destructuring props for cleaner template usage.** Using `props.msg` in the template works, but a more idiomatic pattern is to destructure the prop: ```ts <script setup lang="ts"> const { msg } = defineProps<Props>(); </script>Then use
{{ msg }}in the template for clarity.
7-90: Addnoreferrerto external links for enhanced security.All
<a target="_blank" rel="noopener">tags should includenoreferreralongsidenoopenerto prevent leaking referrer data:- target="_blank" rel="noopener" + target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"src/router/index.ts (3)
5-9: Consider lazy-loading the login page for consistency.You could lazy-load
LoginPage.vueto reduce the initial bundle size:component: () => import(/* webpackChunkName: "login" */ "@/components/LoginPage.vue"),
4-28: Inconsistent route naming conventions.Route
namevalues mix PascalCase ("Login") and lowercase ("home","signup"). Standardize naming (e.g., kebab-case or PascalCase) for clarity and to avoid routing logic issues.
30-33: Missing fallback for unmatched routes.Add a catch-all route to handle 404s and redirect or show a NotFound component:
{ path: '/:pathMatch(.*)*', name: 'NotFound', component: () => import(/* webpackChunkName: "notfound" */ "../views/NotFound.vue") }nginx.conf (3)
1-4: Parameterizeserver_nameand port for flexible deployments.Hardcoding
localhostand port8080limits production use. Consider using environment variables or a CI/CD template to setserver_nameandlistendirectives dynamically.
5-9: Moverootdirective toserverblock.Defining
rootinsidelocationis valid, but placing it at theserverlevel reduces duplication if you add morelocationblocks:server { root /usr/share/nginx/html; ... location / { ... } }
11-14: Enhance security with common response headers.Add headers like
X-Content-Type-Options,X-Frame-Options, and a Content-Security-Policy to mitigate XSS and clickjacking:add_header X-Content-Type-Options nosniff; add_header X-Frame-Options SAMEORIGIN; add_header Content-Security-Policy "default-src 'self';";public/index.html (1)
7-7: Use build-time CSS instead of CDN script for Tailwind.Loading
@tailwindcss/browserat runtime increases load time and may expose unminified code. Prefer integrating Tailwind via PostCSS or the build pipeline for performance and caching.tsconfig.json (2)
5-5: Enable strict mode for stronger type safety.
"strict": falsedisables all strict checks. Consider setting"strict": true(or at least"noImplicitAny"and"strictNullChecks") to catch errors early in development.
29-36: Include test environment types when adding tests.The
includesection covers test files, but you may want to add"types": ["vitest"]or other test runner types undercompilerOptions.typesonce you introduce tests so they compile without type errors.Dockerfile (2)
1-21: Remove commented codeThe file contains commented-out code from a previous implementation. This can be confusing for developers and should be removed to keep the codebase clean.
-# # Build stage -# FROM node:16 as build-stage -# WORKDIR /app -# COPY package*.json ./ -# RUN yarn -# COPY . . -# RUN yarn build - -# # Production stage -# FROM nginx:stable-alpine as production-stage -# COPY --from=build-stage /app/dist /usr/share/nginx/html -# COPY nginx.conf /etc/nginx/conf.d/default.conf - -# # Create a startup script -# RUN echo '#!/bin/sh' > /docker-entrypoint.d/00-update-port.sh && \ -# echo 'sed -i "s/listen 8080/listen $PORT/g" /etc/nginx/conf.d/default.conf' >> /docker-entrypoint.d/00-update-port.sh && \ -# chmod +x /docker-entrypoint.d/00-update-port.sh - -# EXPOSE 8080 -# CMD ["nginx", "-g", "daemon off;"]
45-47: Remove duplicated commented codeThese lines duplicate the commands that are already active above. Remove them to maintain a clean codebase.
-# EXPOSE 8080 - -# CMD ["nginx", "-g", "daemon off;"]package.json (1)
37-52: Consider moving ESLint configuration to a separate fileFor better maintainability in larger projects, consider moving the ESLint configuration to a dedicated
.eslintrc.jsfile. This makes it easier to update and maintain over time.src/components/SignUp.vue (3)
262-267: Remove commented codeRemove commented out code to keep the codebase clean and maintainable.
try { - // const resp = await api.post("/auth/signup", { - // email: form.value.email, - // password: form.value.password, - // }); await api.post("/users", {
139-140: Update autocomplete attribute for verify password fieldThe autocomplete attribute should be "new-password" for the verification field to better comply with browser standards.
v-model="form.verifyPass" - autocomplete="current-password" + autocomplete="new-password" class="block w-full rounded-md bg-white px-3 py-1.5 text-base text-gray-900 outline-1 -outline-offset-1 outline-gray-300 placeholder:text-gray-400 focus:outline-2 focus:-outline-offset-2 focus:outline-indigo-600 sm:text-sm/6"
208-210: Use router-link instead of anchor tagReplace the anchor tag with router-link for better integration with Vue Router, preventing full page reloads.
<p class="mt-10 text-center text-sm/6 text-gray-500"> Already have account - <a href="/" class="font-semibold text-indigo-600 hover:text-indigo-500">Sign In</a> + <router-link to="/" class="font-semibold text-indigo-600 hover:text-indigo-500">Sign In</router-link> </p>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
public/favicon.icois excluded by!**/*.icosrc/assets/logo.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngyarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (24)
.gitignore(1 hunks).prettierrc(1 hunks)Dockerfile(1 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)babel.config.js(1 hunks)nginx.conf(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)public/askSebby-chatbot.js(1 hunks)public/chatbot-widget.js(1 hunks)public/index.html(1 hunks)src/App.vue(1 hunks)src/components/ErrorComponent.vue(1 hunks)src/components/HelloWorld.vue(1 hunks)src/components/LoginPage.vue(1 hunks)src/components/SignUp.vue(1 hunks)src/main.ts(1 hunks)src/router/index.ts(1 hunks)src/service/api.ts(1 hunks)src/shims-vue.d.ts(1 hunks)src/store/errorStore.ts(1 hunks)src/views/AboutView.vue(1 hunks)src/views/HomeView.vue(1 hunks)tsconfig.json(1 hunks)vue.config.js(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
public/askSebby-chatbot.js (1)
public/chatbot-widget.js (7)
config(12-27)styles(30-30)widget(280-280)button(284-284)container(292-292)elements(332-332)isOpen(333-333)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
README.md
4-4: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
9-9: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
14-14: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
19-19: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/shims-vue.d.ts
[error] 4-4: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 4-4: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
src/service/api.ts (1)
3-8: 80 s timeout feels excessiveA minute-plus wait will be perceived as a hang. 10-30 s is more common unless you have long-poll/streaming.
babel.config.js (1)
1-3: Babel config looks goodThe preset matches Vue-CLI defaults and should work out of the box.
vue.config.js (1)
1-4: Configuration is minimal yet sufficient
transpileDependencies: trueis often necessary for some NPM packages; LGTM.src/views/HomeView.vue (1)
8-10: Component registration is correct
Leveraging the<script setup>syntax automatically registers the importedHelloWorldcomponent. No further changes needed here.src/App.vue (1)
11-13: Global error handling setup looks solid
Rendering<ErrorComponent />above<router-view />ensures centralized error messages display consistently across routes.src/main.ts (1)
1-9: Vue app bootstrap is correct
The initialization sequence withcreateApp, Pinia, and Vue Router follows best practices and mounts cleanly on#app.src/shims-vue.d.ts (1)
1-6: TypeScript declaration file for Vue components looks good.This is a standard TypeScript declaration file that allows TypeScript to recognize
.vuefiles as modules exporting Vue components. This configuration is essential for Vue 3 + TypeScript projects.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 4-4: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 4-4: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
src/components/ErrorComponent.vue (2)
1-21: Well-structured error alert component with good accessibility attributes.The error component implements a visually clear alert with proper color coding and includes accessibility attributes like
role="alert". The conditional rendering withv-ifis appropriate for toggling visibility.
23-29: Clean implementation using Composition API.The script section uses Vue 3's Composition API with
script setupsyntax, making the code concise and maintainable. The error state store is properly imported and used.src/store/errorStore.ts (1)
3-18: Pinia store implementation follows best practices.The error store is well structured with clear state and actions. Using Pinia for global error state management is a good architectural decision.
README.md (1)
1-25: README provides essential project information.The README includes the necessary commands for setting up and working with the project. The CodeRabbit badge is a nice touch for showing automated code review status.
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
4-4: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null(MD040, fenced-code-language)
9-9: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null(MD040, fenced-code-language)
14-14: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null(MD040, fenced-code-language)
19-19: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null(MD040, fenced-code-language)
src/components/HelloWorld.vue (2)
95-105: Script setup props definition is correct.The
defineProps<Props>()usage is accurate, and TypeScript typings are properly enforced.
108-123: Scoped CSS usage is appropriate.The scoped styles correctly limit CSS to this component. No issues found.
src/components/LoginPage.vue (1)
49-52: Implement 'Forgot password' functionalityThe "Forgot password" link is currently non-functional. Either implement the functionality or remove/disable the link to avoid confusion.
<div class="text-sm"> - <a href="#" class="font-semibold text-indigo-600 hover:text-indigo-500"> + <a href="/password-reset" class="font-semibold text-indigo-600 hover:text-indigo-500"> Forgot password? </a> </div>If you choose to implement this, ensure to create a corresponding route and component.
| const api = axios.create({ | ||
| // baseURL: "http://127.0.0.1:8080", | ||
| baseURL: "http://localhost:8080", | ||
| timeout: 80000, | ||
| headers: { "Content-Type": "application/json" }, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Hard-coded HTTP base URL + vulnerable axios version
-
Storing the base URL inline locks you to localhost & plain HTTP, which breaks in staging/production and prevents TLS.
• Preferimport.meta.env.VITE_API_BASE_URL(or similar) and default to HTTPS. -
The repo’s
package.jsonpins axios1.7.9, which is affected by CVE-2025-27152 (SSRF / credential leakage).
• Upgrade to1.8.2or newer before shipping.
-const api = axios.create({
- // baseURL: "http://127.0.0.1:8080",
- baseURL: "http://localhost:8080",
+const api = axios.create({
+ baseURL: import.meta.env.VITE_API_BASE_URL ?? "https://api.example.com",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const api = axios.create({ | |
| // baseURL: "http://127.0.0.1:8080", | |
| baseURL: "http://localhost:8080", | |
| timeout: 80000, | |
| headers: { "Content-Type": "application/json" }, | |
| }); | |
| const api = axios.create({ | |
| baseURL: import.meta.env.VITE_API_BASE_URL ?? "https://api.example.com", | |
| timeout: 80000, | |
| headers: { "Content-Type": "application/json" }, | |
| }); |
| apiEndpoint: "https://fmkt8f48q6.execute-api.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/dev/bedrock-res", | ||
| primaryColor: "#4a6cf7", | ||
| title: "Chat Support", | ||
| welcomeMessage: "Hi there! How can I help you today?", | ||
| placeholderText: "Type your message here...", | ||
| waitingPlaceholder: "Please wait...", | ||
| position: "right", // 'right' or 'left' | ||
| avatarBot: "🤖", | ||
| avatarUser: "👤", | ||
| apiHeaders: { "Content-Type": "application/json" }, | ||
| messageDelay: 300, // milliseconds delay for bot messages to appear |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hard-coded AWS endpoint & headers risk credential leakage
The widget ships with a public Bedrock URL and default headers, encouraging devs to copy-paste secrets into window.ChatbotConfig.
Move the endpoint to a server-side .env, proxy through your own backend, or at minimum document never committing keys.
Also avoid setting both x-api-key and Authorization headers – pick one contractual mechanism.
| function addBotMessage(text) { | ||
| const typingIndicator = document.createElement("div"); | ||
| typingIndicator.className = "typing-indicator"; | ||
| typingIndicator.innerHTML = "<span></span><span></span><span></span>"; | ||
| elements.messagesContainer.appendChild(typingIndicator); | ||
|
|
||
| // Scroll to bottom | ||
| scrollToBottom(); | ||
|
|
||
| // Show typing indicator for a moment | ||
| setTimeout(() => { | ||
| // Remove typing indicator | ||
| elements.messagesContainer.removeChild(typingIndicator); | ||
|
|
||
| // Add actual message | ||
| const messageElement = document.createElement("div"); | ||
| messageElement.className = "chatbot-message bot"; | ||
| messageElement.innerHTML = ` | ||
| <div class="avatar">${config.avatarBot}</div> | ||
| <div class="content">${text}</div> | ||
| `; | ||
| elements.messagesContainer.appendChild(messageElement); | ||
|
|
||
| // Scroll to bottom again | ||
| scrollToBottom(); | ||
| }, config.messageDelay); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Potential XSS – user / bot text is injected via innerHTML
Messages use template literals which will execute any <script> that sneaks into text.
Switch to textContent (or a DOMPurify sanitiser) for both user and bot messages.
-const messageElement = document.createElement("div");
-...
-messageElement.innerHTML = `
- <div class="avatar">${config.avatarBot}</div>
- <div class="content">${text}</div>
-`;
+const messageElement = document.createElement("div");
+messageElement.className = "chatbot-message bot";
+const avatar = document.createElement("div");
+avatar.className = "avatar";
+avatar.textContent = config.avatarBot;
+const content = document.createElement("div");
+content.className = "content";
+content.textContent = text; // SAFE
+messageElement.append(avatar, content);Apply the same pattern in addUserMessage.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| function addBotMessage(text) { | |
| const typingIndicator = document.createElement("div"); | |
| typingIndicator.className = "typing-indicator"; | |
| typingIndicator.innerHTML = "<span></span><span></span><span></span>"; | |
| elements.messagesContainer.appendChild(typingIndicator); | |
| // Scroll to bottom | |
| scrollToBottom(); | |
| // Show typing indicator for a moment | |
| setTimeout(() => { | |
| // Remove typing indicator | |
| elements.messagesContainer.removeChild(typingIndicator); | |
| // Add actual message | |
| const messageElement = document.createElement("div"); | |
| messageElement.className = "chatbot-message bot"; | |
| messageElement.innerHTML = ` | |
| <div class="avatar">${config.avatarBot}</div> | |
| <div class="content">${text}</div> | |
| `; | |
| elements.messagesContainer.appendChild(messageElement); | |
| // Scroll to bottom again | |
| scrollToBottom(); | |
| }, config.messageDelay); | |
| } | |
| function addBotMessage(text) { | |
| const typingIndicator = document.createElement("div"); | |
| typingIndicator.className = "typing-indicator"; | |
| typingIndicator.innerHTML = "<span></span><span></span><span></span>"; | |
| elements.messagesContainer.appendChild(typingIndicator); | |
| // Scroll to bottom | |
| scrollToBottom(); | |
| // Show typing indicator for a moment | |
| setTimeout(() => { | |
| // Remove typing indicator | |
| elements.messagesContainer.removeChild(typingIndicator); | |
| // Add actual message | |
| const messageElement = document.createElement("div"); | |
| messageElement.className = "chatbot-message bot"; | |
| const avatar = document.createElement("div"); | |
| avatar.className = "avatar"; | |
| avatar.textContent = config.avatarBot; | |
| const content = document.createElement("div"); | |
| content.className = "content"; | |
| content.textContent = text; // SAFE | |
| messageElement.append(avatar, content); | |
| elements.messagesContainer.appendChild(messageElement); | |
| // Scroll to bottom again | |
| scrollToBottom(); | |
| }, config.messageDelay); | |
| } |
| async function sendMessageToBedrock(message) { | ||
| try { | ||
| // In a real implementation, you should use proper AWS signature generation | ||
| // This is a simplified example | ||
| const response = await fetch(config.apiEndpoint, { | ||
| method: "POST", | ||
| headers: { | ||
| "Content-Type": "application/json", | ||
| "X-Amz-Date": new Date().toISOString(), | ||
| Authorization: `AWS4-HMAC-SHA256 Credential=${config.awsAccessKey}/${getDate()}/${ | ||
| config.awsRegion | ||
| }/bedrock/aws4_request`, | ||
| // In a real implementation, add proper AWS SigV4 signature headers | ||
| }, | ||
| body: JSON.stringify({ | ||
| modelId: config.modelId, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Do not send AWS credentials from the browser & implement real SigV4
The Authorization header is incomplete (missing signature, credential scope, signed headers, etc.).
Even if fixed, any SigV4-signed request produced in the browser would expose your secret key, defeating the entire purpose.
Recommended pattern:
- Proxy Bedrock calls through your backend; sign the request server-side.
- Or, if you must call Bedrock directly, use
@aws-sdk/client-bedrock-runtimewith temporary Cognito-issued credentials (Identity Pools) – still avoid embedding long-lived keys.
Until then the call will 4XX and you risk credential leakage.
| apiEndpoint: | ||
| "https://bedrock-runtime.YOUR_REGION.amazonaws.com/model/anthropic.claude-v2/invoke", | ||
| position: "right", // 'right' or 'left' | ||
| awsAccessKey: "YOUR_AWS_ACCESS_KEY", | ||
| awsSecretKey: "YOUR_AWS_SECRET_KEY", | ||
| awsRegion: "YOUR_REGION", | ||
| modelId: "anthropic.claude-v2", | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove hard-coded secrets and move runtime config to env-vars
awsAccessKey, awsSecretKey, awsRegion, apiEndpoint, and even modelId are baked into the JS bundle.
If these placeholders are ever replaced with real credentials they will be exposed to every site visitor, compromising your AWS account.
Action:
- awsAccessKey: "YOUR_AWS_ACCESS_KEY",
- awsSecretKey: "YOUR_AWS_SECRET_KEY",
- awsRegion: "YOUR_REGION",
- modelId: "anthropic.claude-v2",
+ // Read from data-attributes or a server-rendered <script> tag to keep
+ // secrets on the server. Never ship long-lived AWS keys to the browser.
+ awsRegion: import.meta.env.VITE_AWS_REGION,
+ modelId: import.meta.env.VITE_BEDROCK_MODEL_ID,Also make the apiEndpoint injectable the same way.
This will let you keep secrets in CI/CD or server-side configuration and stay compliant with AWS security guidance.
| try { | ||
| // const resp = await api.post("/auth/signup", { | ||
| // email: form.value.email, | ||
| // password: form.value.password, | ||
| // }); | ||
|
|
||
| await api.post("/users", { | ||
| email: form.value.email, | ||
| password: form.value.password, | ||
| }); | ||
| } catch (error) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add success feedback after signup
The component doesn't provide any feedback on successful signup. Add a success notification and redirect to the login page.
async function onSignUp() {
if (!isFormValid.value) {
errorState.setError("Please fill in all fields correctly.");
return;
}
+ const isLoading = ref(false);
+ isLoading.value = true;
try {
// const resp = await api.post("/auth/signup", {
// email: form.value.email,
// password: form.value.password,
// });
- await api.post("/users", {
+ const response = await api.post("/users", {
email: form.value.email,
password: form.value.password,
});
+
+ if (response.status === 200 || response.status === 201) {
+ // Show success message
+ errorState.setSuccess("Account created successfully! Redirecting to login...");
+
+ // Redirect to login page after a short delay
+ setTimeout(() => {
+ window.location.href = "/";
+ }, 2000);
+ }
} catch (error) {
const errorMsg = error?.response?.data?.detail || "some error occurred";
errorState.setError(errorMsg);
+ isLoading.value = false;
}
}Note: You'll need to update your error store to support success messages:
// In src/store/errorStore.ts
export const useErrorState = defineStore('error', {
state: () => ({
error: null as string | null,
success: null as string | null,
}),
actions: {
setError(error: any) {
this.error = typeof error === 'string' ? error : JSON.stringify(error);
this.success = null;
},
setSuccess(message: string) {
this.success = message;
this.error = null;
},
clearMessages() {
this.error = null;
this.success = null;
}
}
});There was a problem hiding this comment.
Generate unit testing code for this file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
graph TB
A[Generate Unit Tests for SignUp.vue]
A --> B[Setup Test Environment]
A --> C[Component Rendering Tests]
A --> D[Form Validation Tests]
A --> E[UI Interaction Tests]
A --> F[Form Submission Tests]
B --> B1[Create mocks for api and errorState]
B --> B2[Setup test environment config]
C --> C1[Test initial component rendering]
C --> C2[Test error messages display]
D --> D1[Test email validation]
D --> D2[Test password validation]
D --> D3[Test password matching validation]
E --> E1[Test password visibility toggling]
F --> F1[Test successful form submission]
F --> F2[Test form submission with API error]
F --> F3[Test form submission with validation errors]
After analyzing your request, I'll generate comprehensive unit tests for the SignUp.vue component. The plan includes setting up the testing environment, mocking external dependencies, and testing all component functionality including rendering, validation, UI interactions, and form submission.
Another agent will create the test files based on this plan. The tests will be implemented using Vue Test Utils and Vitest (or Jest), and will cover:
- Basic component rendering
- Form validation (email format, password length, matching)
- UI interactions (password visibility toggling)
- Form submission success and error handling
- API integration testing with mocks
Would you like me to add any specific test cases beyond what I've outlined in the plan?
⏳ Preparing changes...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A summary of the edits CodeRabbit can apply:
Unit tests for the SignUp.vue component will be created in tests/unit/components/SignUp.spec.ts.
We will add unit tests for the SignUp.vue component in tests/unit/components/SignUp.spec.ts covering test setup, rendering, validation, UI interactions, and form submission scenarios.
We will create a new test file
SignUp.spec.tsundertests/unit/componentscontaining comprehensive unit tests for SignUp.vue.
A new unit test file tests/unit/components/SignUp.spec.ts will be created containing setup, rendering, validation, UI interaction, and form submission tests for SignUp.vue.
A plan of each step that CodeRabbit will take in order to execute the edits for each file (with inline rough draft snippets):
📄 tests/unit/components/SignUp.spec.ts
Create the test file and set up the testing environment, including mounting utilities, Vitest imports, and mocks for the API and error store:
import { mount, flushPromises } from '@vue/test-utils'
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest'
import SignUp from '@/components/SignUp.vue'
// Mock the external dependencies
vi.mock('@/service/api', () => ({
default: { post: vi.fn() }
}))
vi.mock('@/store/errorStore', () => ({
useErrorState: vi.fn(() => ({
setError: vi.fn(),
clearErrorMsg: vi.fn()
}))
}))
import api from '@/service/api'
import { useErrorState } from '@/store/errorStore'
describe('SignUp.vue', () => {
let wrapper: ReturnType<typeof mount>
let errorStateMock: { setError: any, clearErrorMsg: any }
beforeEach(() => {
vi.resetAllMocks()
errorStateMock = { setError: vi.fn(), clearErrorMsg: vi.fn() }
;(useErrorState as any).mockReturnValue(errorStateMock)
wrapper = mount(SignUp)
})
// Placeholder for tests
})Under the // Placeholder for tests comment, add component rendering, form validation, and UI interaction tests:
// Component rendering tests
it('renders the sign up form correctly', () => {
expect(wrapper.find('h2').text()).toBe('Sign Up')
expect(wrapper.find('form').exists()).toBe(true)
expect(wrapper.find('input[type="email"]').exists()).toBe(true)
expect(wrapper.find('input[id="password"]').exists()).toBe(true)
expect(wrapper.find('button[type="submit"]').text()).toBe('Sign up')
})
it('disables the submit button when form is invalid', async () => {
const submitButton = wrapper.find('button[type="submit"]')
expect(submitButton.attributes('disabled')).toBeDefined()
})
// Form validation tests
it('validates email format', async () => {
const emailInput = wrapper.find('input[type="email"]')
await emailInput.setValue('invalid-email')
await emailInput.trigger('blur')
expect(wrapper.text()).toContain('Email must be valid')
await emailInput.setValue('[email protected]')
await emailInput.trigger('blur')
expect(wrapper.text()).not.toContain('Email must be valid')
})
it('validates password length', async () => {
const passwordInput = wrapper.find('input[id="password"]')
await passwordInput.setValue('12345')
await passwordInput.trigger('blur')
expect(wrapper.text()).toContain('Password must be at least 6 characters')
await passwordInput.setValue('123456')
await passwordInput.trigger('blur')
expect(wrapper.text()).not.toContain('Password must be at least 6 characters')
})
it('validates password matching', async () => {
const inputs = wrapper.findAll('input[id="password"]')
const passwordInput = inputs[0]
const verifyInput = inputs[1]
await passwordInput.setValue('password123')
await verifyInput.setValue('different')
expect(wrapper.text()).toContain('Password is not matching')
await verifyInput.setValue('password123')
expect(wrapper.text()).not.toContain('Password is not matching')
})
it('enables the submit button when form is valid', async () => {
const emailInput = wrapper.find('input[type="email"]')
const inputs = wrapper.findAll('input[id="password"]')
const passwordInput = inputs[0]
const verifyInput = inputs[1]
await emailInput.setValue('[email protected]')
await passwordInput.setValue('password123')
await verifyInput.setValue('password123')
const submitButton = wrapper.find('button[type="submit"]')
expect(submitButton.attributes('disabled')).toBeUndefined()
})
// UI Interaction tests
it('toggles password visibility', async () => {
const passwordInput = wrapper.find('input[id="password"]')
const toggleButton = wrapper.find('button[aria-label="Toggle password visibility"]')
expect(passwordInput.attributes('type')).toBe('password')
await toggleButton.trigger('click')
expect(passwordInput.attributes('type')).toBe('text')
await toggleButton.trigger('click')
expect(passwordInput.attributes('type')).toBe('password')
})After the existing tests, add form submission tests covering success, API errors with detail, generic errors, and prevention of submission on validation failure:
// Form submission tests
it('submits the form with valid data', async () => {
(api.post as any).mockResolvedValue({ status: 201, data: { id: 1 } })
const emailInput = wrapper.find('input[type="email"]')
const inputs = wrapper.findAll('input[id="password"]')
const passwordInput = inputs[0]
const verifyInput = inputs[1]
await emailInput.setValue('[email protected]')
await passwordInput.setValue('password123')
await verifyInput.setValue('password123')
await wrapper.find('form').trigger('submit')
await flushPromises()
expect(api.post).toHaveBeenCalledWith('/users', {
email: '[email protected]',
password: 'password123'
})
})
it('shows error when API request fails', async () => {
const errorResponse = { response: { data: { detail: 'Email already exists' } } }
(api.post as any).mockRejectedValue(errorResponse)
const emailInput = wrapper.find('input[type="email"]')
const inputs = wrapper.findAll('input[id="password"]')
const passwordInput = inputs[0]
const verifyInput = inputs[1]
await emailInput.setValue('[email protected]')
await passwordInput.setValue('password123')
await verifyInput.setValue('password123')
await wrapper.find('form').trigger('submit')
await flushPromises()
expect(errorStateMock.setError).toHaveBeenCalledWith('Email already exists')
})
it('shows generic error when API fails without detail', async () => {
(api.post as any).mockRejectedValue(new Error('Network error'))
const emailInput = wrapper.find('input[type="email"]')
const inputs = wrapper.findAll('input[id="password"]')
const passwordInput = inputs[0]
const verifyInput = inputs[1]
await emailInput.setValue('[email protected]')
await passwordInput.setValue('password123')
await verifyInput.setValue('password123')
await wrapper.find('form').trigger('submit')
await flushPromises()
expect(errorStateMock.setError).toHaveBeenCalledWith('some error occurred')
})
it('prevents form submission when validation fails', async () => {
const inputs = wrapper.findAll('input[id="password"]')
const passwordInput = inputs[0]
const verifyInput = inputs[1]
await passwordInput.setValue('password123')
await verifyInput.setValue('password123')
await wrapper.find('form').trigger('submit')
expect(api.post).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
expect(errorStateMock.setError).toHaveBeenCalledWith('Please fill in all fields correctly.')
})
})At the top of tests/unit/components/SignUp.spec.ts, add the necessary imports and mocks:
import { mount, flushPromises } from '@vue/test-utils'
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest'
import SignUp from '@/components/SignUp.vue'
// Mock the external dependencies with the correct action names
vi.mock('@/service/api', () => ({
default: { post: vi.fn() }
}))
vi.mock('@/store/errorStore', () => ({
useErrorState: vi.fn(() => ({
setError: vi.fn(),
setSuccess: vi.fn(),
clearMessages: vi.fn()
}))
}))
// Import the mocked modules
import api from '@/service/api'
import { useErrorState } from '@/store/errorStore'Initialize the test suite and mount the component with a fresh errorState mock before each test:
describe('SignUp.vue', () => {
let wrapper: ReturnType<typeof mount>
let errorStateMock: { setError: any; setSuccess: any; clearMessages: any }
beforeEach(() => {
vi.resetAllMocks()
errorStateMock = {
setError: vi.fn(),
setSuccess: vi.fn(),
clearMessages: vi.fn()
}
;(useErrorState as any).mockReturnValue(errorStateMock)
wrapper = mount(SignUp)
})
// Component rendering, validation, UI interaction, and submission tests go here
})Within the describe block, add component rendering and validation tests:
it('renders the sign up form correctly', () => {
expect(wrapper.find('h2').text()).toBe('Sign Up')
expect(wrapper.find('form').exists()).toBe(true)
expect(wrapper.find('input[type="email"]').exists()).toBe(true)
expect(wrapper.find('input[id="password"]').exists()).toBe(true)
expect(wrapper.find('button[type="submit"]').text()).toBe('Sign up')
})
it('disables the submit button when form is invalid', () => {
const btn = wrapper.find('button[type="submit"]')
expect(btn.attributes('disabled')).toBeDefined()
})
it('validates email format', async () => {
const email = wrapper.find('input[type="email"]')
await email.setValue('bad-email')
await email.trigger('blur')
expect(wrapper.text()).toContain('Email must be valid')
await email.setValue('[email protected]')
await email.trigger('blur')
expect(wrapper.text()).not.toContain('Email must be valid')
})
it('validates password length and matching', async () => {
const pwd = wrapper.find('input[id="password"]')
const verify = wrapper.findAll('input[id="password"]')[1]
await pwd.setValue('12345')
await pwd.trigger('blur')
expect(wrapper.text()).toContain('Password must be at least 6 characters')
await pwd.setValue('123456')
await pwd.trigger('blur')
expect(wrapper.text()).not.toContain('Password must be at least 6 characters')
await verify.setValue('different')
expect(wrapper.text()).toContain('Password is not matching')
await verify.setValue('123456')
expect(wrapper.text()).not.toContain('Password is not matching')
})
it('toggles password visibility', async () => {
const pwd = wrapper.find('input[id="password"]')
const toggle = wrapper.find('button[aria-label="Toggle password visibility"]')
expect(pwd.attributes('type')).toBe('password')
await toggle.trigger('click')
expect(pwd.attributes('type')).toBe('text')
await toggle.trigger('click')
expect(pwd.attributes('type')).toBe('password')
})Add form submission tests covering successful signup, API errors with and without detail, and client-side validation blocking:
it('submits the form with valid data', async () => {
(api.post as any).mockResolvedValue({ status: 201, data: { id: 1 } })
await wrapper.find('input[type="email"]').setValue('[email protected]')
await wrapper.find('input[id="password"]').setValue('password123')
await wrapper.findAll('input[id="password"]')[1].setValue('password123')
await wrapper.find('form').trigger('submit')
await flushPromises()
expect(api.post).toHaveBeenCalledWith('/users', {
email: '[email protected]',
password: 'password123'
})
expect(errorStateMock.setSuccess).toHaveBeenCalledWith('Account created successfully! Redirecting to login...')
})
it('shows API error detail', async () => {
const err = { response: { data: { detail: 'Email exists' } } }
(api.post as any).mockRejectedValue(err)
await wrapper.find('input[type="email"]').setValue('[email protected]')
await wrapper.find('input[id="password"]').setValue('password123')
await wrapper.findAll('input[id="password"]')[1].setValue('password123')
await wrapper.find('form').trigger('submit')
await flushPromises()
expect(errorStateMock.setError).toHaveBeenCalledWith('Email exists')
})
it('shows generic error when no detail', async () => {
(api.post as any).mockRejectedValue(new Error('Network down'))
await wrapper.find('input[type="email"]').setValue('[email protected]')
await wrapper.find('input[id="password"]').setValue('password123')
await wrapper.findAll('input[id="password"]')[1].setValue('password123')
await wrapper.find('form').trigger('submit')
await flushPromises()
expect(errorStateMock.setError).toHaveBeenCalledWith('some error occurred')
})
it('prevents submission when validation fails', async () => {
await wrapper.find('input[id="password"]').setValue('password123')
await wrapper.findAll('input[id="password"]')[1].setValue('password123')
await wrapper.find('form').trigger('submit')
expect(api.post).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
expect(errorStateMock.setError).toHaveBeenCalledWith('Please fill in all fields correctly.')
})At the very top of the new file, add import statements from Vue Test Utils and Vitest, then mock external dependencies (API service and error store). Wrap them in a Vitest describe block and set up a beforeEach to mount the component and reset mocks:
import { mount, flushPromises } from '@vue/test-utils'
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest'
import SignUp from '@/components/SignUp.vue'
// Mock the external dependencies
vi.mock('@/service/api', () => ({
default: { post: vi.fn() }
}))
vi.mock('@/store/errorStore', () => ({
useErrorState: vi.fn(() => ({
setError: vi.fn(),
setSuccess: vi.fn(),
clearMessages: vi.fn()
}))
}))
// Import the mocked modules
import api from '@/service/api'
import { useErrorState } from '@/store/errorStore'
describe('SignUp.vue', () => {
let wrapper: ReturnType<typeof mount>
let errorStateMock: { setError: any; setSuccess: any; clearMessages: any }
beforeEach(() => {
// Reset all mocks before each test
vi.resetAllMocks()
// Provide a fresh error state mock
errorStateMock = {
setError: vi.fn(),
setSuccess: vi.fn(),
clearMessages: vi.fn()
}
;(useErrorState as any).mockReturnValue(errorStateMock)
// Mount the component
wrapper = mount(SignUp)
})
// Subsequent tests will go here
})Immediately after the beforeEach, add component rendering, form validation, and UI interaction tests. These verify the heading, input presence, button disabled state, error messages on blur, enabling button when valid, and password visibility toggling:
// Component rendering tests
it('renders the sign up form correctly', () => {
expect(wrapper.find('h2').text()).toBe('Sign Up')
expect(wrapper.find('form').exists()).toBe(true)
expect(wrapper.find('input[type="email"]').exists()).toBe(true)
expect(wrapper.find('input#password').exists()).toBe(true)
expect(wrapper.find('button[type="submit"]').text()).toBe('Sign up')
})
it('disables the submit button when form is invalid', () => {
const submitButton = wrapper.find('button[type="submit"]')
expect(submitButton.attributes('disabled')).toBeDefined()
})
// Form validation tests
it('validates email format', async () => {
const emailInput = wrapper.find('input[type="email"]')
await emailInput.setValue('invalid-email')
await emailInput.trigger('blur')
expect(wrapper.text()).toContain('Email must be valid')
await emailInput.setValue('[email protected]')
await emailInput.trigger('blur')
expect(wrapper.text()).not.toContain('Email must be valid')
})
it('validates password length', async () => {
const passwordInput = wrapper.find('input#password')
await passwordInput.setValue('12345')
await passwordInput.trigger('blur')
expect(wrapper.text()).toContain('Password must be at least 6 characters')
await passwordInput.setValue('123456')
await passwordInput.trigger('blur')
expect(wrapper.text()).not.toContain('Password must be at least 6 characters')
})
it('validates password matching', async () => {
const [firstPw, secondPw] = wrapper.findAll('input#password')
await firstPw.setValue('password123')
await secondPw.setValue('different')
expect(wrapper.text()).toContain('Password is not matching')
await secondPw.setValue('password123')
expect(wrapper.text()).not.toContain('Password is not matching')
})
it('enables the submit button when form is valid', async () => {
const [emailInput, pwInput, verifyInput] = [
wrapper.find('input[type="email"]'),
wrapper.find('input#password'),
wrapper.findAll('input#password')[1]
]
await emailInput.setValue('[email protected]')
await pwInput.setValue('password123')
await verifyInput.setValue('password123')
const submitButton = wrapper.find('button[type="submit"]')
expect(submitButton.attributes('disabled')).toBeUndefined()
})
// UI interaction test
it('toggles password visibility', async () => {
const passwordInput = wrapper.find('input#password')
const toggleButton = wrapper.find('button[aria-label="Toggle password visibility"]')
expect(passwordInput.attributes('type')).toBe('password')
await toggleButton.trigger('click')
expect(passwordInput.attributes('type')).toBe('text')
await toggleButton.trigger('click')
expect(passwordInput.attributes('type')).toBe('password')
})Finally, add form submission tests to cover successful signup, API failures with specific and generic errors, and prevention of submission when validation fails:
// Form submission tests
it('submits the form with valid data', async () => {
(api.post as any).mockResolvedValue({ status: 201, data: { id: 1 } })
const [emailInput, pwInput, verifyInput] = [
wrapper.find('input[type="email"]'),
wrapper.find('input#password'),
wrapper.findAll('input#password')[1]
]
await emailInput.setValue('[email protected]')
await pwInput.setValue('password123')
await verifyInput.setValue('password123')
await wrapper.find('form').trigger('submit')
await flushPromises()
expect(api.post).toHaveBeenCalledWith('/users', {
email: '[email protected]',
password: 'password123'
})
})
it('shows error when API request fails with detail', async () => {
(api.post as any).mockRejectedValue({ response: { data: { detail: 'Email already exists' } } })
const [emailInput, pwInput, verifyInput] = [
wrapper.find('input[type="email"]'),
wrapper.find('input#password'),
wrapper.findAll('input#password')[1]
]
await emailInput.setValue('[email protected]')
await pwInput.setValue('password123')
await verifyInput.setValue('password123')
await wrapper.find('form').trigger('submit')
await flushPromises()
expect(errorStateMock.setError).toHaveBeenCalledWith('Email already exists')
})
it('shows generic error when API fails without detail', async () => {
(api.post as any).mockRejectedValue(new Error('Network error'))
const [emailInput, pwInput, verifyInput] = [
wrapper.find('input[type="email"]'),
wrapper.find('input#password'),
wrapper.findAll('input#password')[1]
]
await emailInput.setValue('[email protected]')
await pwInput.setValue('password123')
await verifyInput.setValue('password123')
await wrapper.find('form').trigger('submit')
await flushPromises()
expect(errorStateMock.setError).toHaveBeenCalledWith('some error occurred')
})
it('prevents form submission when validation fails', async () => {
const [pwInput, verifyInput] = wrapper.findAll('input#password')
await pwInput.setValue('password123')
await verifyInput.setValue('password123')
await wrapper.find('form').trigger('submit')
expect(api.post).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
expect(errorStateMock.setError).toHaveBeenCalledWith('Please fill in all fields correctly.')
})
})A summary of the context that CodeRabbit is considering across the codebase:
We need to locate the API client implementation to confirm the existence of api.post for mocking in our tests.
Inspect the API client to verify that it exports a default object with a post method.
Review the error store to understand its current shape and actions, so our mocks align with the real API.
Locate the SignUp.vue component in the codebase to determine the correct import path for the tests.
Inspect the error store to confirm the exact action names (setError, setSuccess, clearMessages) so that our mocks align with the real API.
Verify the API service file to confirm that the default export is an object with a post() method we can mock.
We need to verify the exact path and contents of the API service module to ensure our test mock targets the correct file and its
postmethod.
We need to confirm the definition of
useErrorStatein our Pinia store so we can accurately mock its methods (setError,setSuccess,clearMessages) in tests.
Locate the SignUp.vue component to confirm the import path for our tests.
Locate the API service module to verify the path for mocking in our tests.
Locate the error store module to verify the store path and exported functions.
-
✅ Create PR with these edits
-
📋 Get copyable edits
-
📌 Create commit in current branch
-
🔄 Try a different approach
-
⏪ Go back to ordinary chat
| Password must be at least 6 characters. | ||
| </span> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Update password validation message
Change the validation error message to match the enhanced password requirements.
<span
v-if="errors.password && errors.password.minLength"
class="text-red-500 text-xs mt-1 block"
>
- Password must be at least 6 characters.
+ Password must be at least 8 characters and include uppercase, lowercase, number, and special characters.
</span>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Password must be at least 6 characters. | |
| </span> | |
| <span | |
| v-if="errors.password && errors.password.minLength" | |
| class="text-red-500 text-xs mt-1 block" | |
| > | |
| Password must be at least 8 characters and include uppercase, lowercase, number, and special characters. | |
| </span> |
| const isFormValid = computed(() => { | ||
| return ( | ||
| form.value.email && | ||
| form.value.password && | ||
| emailRegex.test(form.value.email) && | ||
| form.value.password.length >= 6 && | ||
| form.value.password === form.value.verifyPass | ||
| ); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance password security requirements
Similar to the login form, the password validation is too weak. Strengthen the requirements to include a mix of character types.
+const emailRegex = /^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/;
+const passwordRegex = /^(?=.*[a-z])(?=.*[A-Z])(?=.*\d)(?=.*[@$!%*?&])[A-Za-z\d@$!%*?&]{8,}$/;
const isFormValid = computed(() => {
return (
form.value.email &&
form.value.password &&
emailRegex.test(form.value.email) &&
- form.value.password.length >= 6 &&
+ passwordRegex.test(form.value.password) &&
form.value.password === form.value.verifyPass
);
});
-const emailRegex = /^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/;Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| minLength: form.value.password ? form.value.password.length < 6 : false, | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Update password validation to match enhanced requirements
Update the validation function to check against the new password regex pattern.
errors.password = {
required: !form.value.password,
- minLength: form.value.password ? form.value.password.length < 6 : false,
+ minLength: form.value.password ? !passwordRegex.test(form.value.password) : false,
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| minLength: form.value.password ? form.value.password.length < 6 : false, | |
| }; | |
| errors.password = { | |
| required: !form.value.password, | |
| minLength: form.value.password ? !passwordRegex.test(form.value.password) : false, | |
| }; |
| name="password" | ||
| id="password" | ||
| v-model="form.verifyPass" | ||
| autocomplete="current-password" | ||
| class="block w-full rounded-md bg-white px-3 py-1.5 text-base text-gray-900 outline-1 -outline-offset-1 outline-gray-300 placeholder:text-gray-400 focus:outline-2 focus:-outline-offset-2 focus:outline-indigo-600 sm:text-sm/6" | ||
| /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix duplicate ID attribute
The password verification field has the same ID as the password field. This violates HTML standards and can cause issues with browser autofill and accessibility.
<input
:type="showVerifyPassword ? 'text' : 'password'"
placeholder="••••••••"
:class="{
'border-red-500': form.verifyPass && form.password !== form.verifyPass,
}"
name="password"
- id="password"
+ id="verify-password"
v-model="form.verifyPass"
autocomplete="current-password"
class="block w-full rounded-md bg-white px-3 py-1.5 text-base text-gray-900 outline-1 -outline-offset-1 outline-gray-300 placeholder:text-gray-400 focus:outline-2 focus:-outline-offset-2 focus:outline-indigo-600 sm:text-sm/6"
/>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| name="password" | |
| id="password" | |
| v-model="form.verifyPass" | |
| autocomplete="current-password" | |
| class="block w-full rounded-md bg-white px-3 py-1.5 text-base text-gray-900 outline-1 -outline-offset-1 outline-gray-300 placeholder:text-gray-400 focus:outline-2 focus:-outline-offset-2 focus:outline-indigo-600 sm:text-sm/6" | |
| /> | |
| <input | |
| :type="showVerifyPassword ? 'text' : 'password'" | |
| placeholder="••••••••" | |
| :class="{ | |
| 'border-red-500': form.verifyPass && form.password !== form.verifyPass, | |
| }" | |
| name="password" | |
| id="verify-password" | |
| v-model="form.verifyPass" | |
| autocomplete="current-password" | |
| class="block w-full rounded-md bg-white px-3 py-1.5 text-base text-gray-900 outline-1 -outline-offset-1 outline-gray-300 placeholder:text-gray-400 focus:outline-2 focus:-outline-offset-2 focus:outline-indigo-600 sm:text-sm/6" | |
| /> |
1 participant
Author Description
Summary
[Brief summary of changes]
Motivation
[Why these changes are needed]
Solution
[Description of the solution]
Testing
[How changes were tested]
PR Title: Front end
🔄 What Changed
This PR introduces a Vue.js frontend application for an authentication system. The implementation includes:
🔍 Impact of the Change
This change establishes the frontend foundation for the authentication application, providing user interfaces for login and registration. The implementation includes form validation, error handling, and API integration, creating a complete authentication flow for users.
📁 Total Files Changed
🧪 Test Added
No explicit tests were added in this PR. The implementation would benefit from unit tests for components and integration tests for the authentication flow.
🔒 Security Vulnerabilities
Package Vulnerabilities
axios (
^1.7.9)1. axios Requests Vulnerable To Possible SSRF and Credential Leakage via Absolute URL
CVE: CVE-2025-27152
Recommended Version (FIX):
1.8.2Quality Recommendations
Add proper input validation and sanitization for all form inputs to prevent XSS attacks
Implement CSRF protection for authentication forms
Move API endpoint URLs to environment variables instead of hardcoding them
Remove or secure the chatbot widget files that contain AWS credential placeholders
Add proper error handling for API calls with specific error messages
Add unit tests for components and authentication flow
Use HTTPS for API communication instead of HTTP
Implement stronger password validation requirements
Add loading states during API calls to improve user experience
Consider implementing token-based authentication with proper storage mechanism
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Chores
.gitignoreto exclude common system, build, and editor files from version control.Style
EntelligenceAI PR Summary
Initial project scaffolding for a Vue.js authentication app with deployment and chatbot widget support.