test: Add build_and_test reusable workflow

[mathbunnyru]

Reasons:

• workflows become simpler
• no code duplication
• more difficult to build and not test something
• no wrong workflow dependencies: before, clang test was waiting for gcc build, which doesn't make sense

I don't want to use steps.conan_export_output.outputs.conan_profile, so mac build is expected to fail on artifact download till we merge #2042

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 72.76%. Comparing base (427ba47) to head (c111fed).
Report is 87 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2048      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    72.71%   72.76%   +0.05%     
===========================================
  Files          333      355      +22     
  Lines        13525    14697    +1172     
  Branches      6881     7464     +583     
===========================================
+ Hits          9835    10695     +860     
- Misses        1785     1975     +190     
- Partials      1905     2027     +122     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[mathbunnyru]

After this change it's much easier to see what has and hasn't been run in GitHub, especially with integration tests.

Before:

After:

[mathbunnyru]

Now we don't upload unit_tests bin when code coverage is enabled.
if: ${{ inputs.unit_tests && !inputs.code_coverage }}

That's why we build gcc Debug build for code coverage, but don't upload binaries.
This PR won't change this behaviour, but after merging it I'll work on refactoring when and how we:

• upload artifacts
• name them
• run code coverage

[godexsoft]

I like the direction this is going 👍 I saw there is an issue with artifact names in the mac portion (https://github.com/XRPLF/clio/actions/runs/14693922110/job/41233037563). I assume this is fixed or will be fixed in another PR.

[mathbunnyru]

I like the direction this is going 👍 I saw there is an issue with artifact names in the mac portion (https://github.com/XRPLF/clio/actions/runs/14693922110/job/41233037563). I assume this is fixed or will be fixed in another PR.

Thanks!

Yes, I fixed it in another PR: #2042, merged it to develop, and updated this branch.
This PR should be good to go now and if CI passes, I will merge it 👍

[godexsoft]

🚀