Skip to content

Conversation

mgehre-amd
Copy link
Collaborator

As discussed in one of the previous TOSA community meetings, we would like to allow for more integer types in the TOSA dialect to enable more use cases.

For strict standards conformance, the TosaValidation pass can be used.

Follow up PRs will extend conversions from TOSA where needed.

@mgehre-amd mgehre-amd requested a review from ljfitz March 22, 2024 15:21
As discussed in one of the previous TOSA community meetings,
we would like to allow for more integer types in the TOSA dialect
to enable more use cases.

For strict standards conformance, the TosaValidation pass can be used.

Follow up PRs will extend conversions from TOSA where needed.
@mgehre-amd mgehre-amd force-pushed the matthias.tosa_all_int branch from e942847 to 9820fd9 Compare March 25, 2024 14:35
@mgehre-amd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Opened upstream at llvm#86509

@mgehre-amd mgehre-amd closed this Mar 25, 2024
jorickert pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2025
)

Since we (Linaro) moved out bots to a new machine, this test has been
failing:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/121/builds/1566

Most of the time, the rss difference is greater than 512 on the first
iteration then settles down to 512 for all the rest.
```
starting rss 512
shadow pages: 1024
p = 0xe083e0800000
1536 -> 740
diff 796
1252 -> 740
diff 512
1252 -> 740
diff 512
1252 -> 740
diff 512
1252 -> 740
diff 512
1252 -> 740
diff 512
1252 -> 740
diff 512
1252 -> 740
diff 512
1252 -> 740
diff 512
1252 -> 740
diff 512
p = 0xe083e0800000
passed 1 out of 10
release-shadow.c.tmp: /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-lld-2stage/llvm/compiler-rt/test/hwasan/TestCases/Linux/release-shadow.c:81: int main(): Assertion `success_count > total_count * 0.8' failed.
```
Given that the test was looking for a diff of at least 513, I guess that
512 is ok too.

For future reference, the original bot host was running this kernel:
Linux 5.15.0-136-generic #147-Ubuntu SMP Sat Mar 15 15:51:36 UTC 2025
aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux

And the new host:
Linux 6.8.0-64-generic #67-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sun Jun 15
20:23:40 UTC 2025 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux

Though the new host also has more RAM, so the kernel may be less
aggresive with memory management.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants