Add spec point comments for wrapper SDK proxy client #2033
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request adds a series of new tests to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
actor TestRunner
participant ProxyClient as WrapperSDKProxy
participant UnderlyingClient as RealTimeClient
participant ProxyChannel as WrapperSDKProxyChannel
participant UnderlyingChannel as RealTimeChannel
TestRunner->>ProxyClient: Initiate connection state test
ProxyClient->>UnderlyingClient: Establish connection
UnderlyingClient-->>ProxyClient: Connected state update
TestRunner->>ProxyClient: Verify connection propagation
TestRunner->>ProxyChannel: Initiate channel attach/detach test
ProxyChannel->>UnderlyingChannel: Propagate state change
UnderlyingChannel-->>ProxyChannel: Channel state update
TestRunner->>ProxyChannel: Validate channel state sync
sequenceDiagram
actor TestRunner
participant ProxyClient as WrapperSDKProxy
participant HTTPHandler as NetworkRequestHandler
TestRunner->>ProxyClient: Trigger HTTP request test
ProxyClient->>HTTPHandler: Send request with SDK agent header
HTTPHandler-->>ProxyClient: Return HTTP response
TestRunner->>ProxyClient: Verify header contains agent info
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
Test/Tests/WrapperSDKProxyTests.swift (3)
8-186: Consider adding edge case tests for state sharing.While the current tests thoroughly cover the basic state sharing scenarios, consider adding tests for:
- Error state propagation
- Race conditions between proxy and underlying client
- Connection/channel recovery scenarios
329-361: Optimize parameterized test helper.The
parameterizedTest_addsWrapperSDKAgentToRequestshelper is well-designed but could be more efficient:
- Consider using a custom assertion message to make test failures more descriptive
- Extract the expected identifier construction to a separate helper method to avoid duplication
func parameterizedTest_addsWrapperSDKAgentToRequests( test: Test, expectedRequestCount: Int = 1, performRequest: @escaping (ARTWrapperSDKProxyRealtime) -> Void ) throws { // ... existing code ... - let expectedIdentifier = [ - "ably-cocoa/1.2.39", - ARTDefault.platformAgent(), - "my-wrapper-sdk/1.0.0" - ].sorted().joined(separator: " ") + let expectedIdentifier = createExpectedIdentifier(wrapperSDK: "my-wrapper-sdk", version: "1.0.0") for request in testHTTPExecutor.requests { - XCTAssertEqual(request.allHTTPHeaderFields?["Ably-Agent"], expectedIdentifier) + XCTAssertEqual( + request.allHTTPHeaderFields?["Ably-Agent"], + expectedIdentifier, + "Request \(request.url?.path ?? "") missing expected Ably-Agent header" + ) } } +private func createExpectedIdentifier(wrapperSDK: String, version: String) -> String { + return [ + "ably-cocoa/1.2.39", + ARTDefault.platformAgent(), + "\(wrapperSDK)/\(version)" + ].sorted().joined(separator: " ") +}
538-621: Enhance agent parameter test robustness.The agent parameter tests are thorough but could be more robust:
- Consider testing with multiple agents to verify correct merging behavior
- Add tests for invalid agent formats
- Verify behavior when params exceed size limits
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Test/Tests/WrapperSDKProxyTests.swift(20 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
- GitHub Check: check (macOS, test_macOS)
- GitHub Check: check (tvOS, test_tvOS17_2)
- GitHub Check: check
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: check (iOS, test_iOS17_2)
- GitHub Check: check
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Test/Tests/WrapperSDKProxyTests.swift (1)
5-7: Well-organized test structure!The tests are excellently organized with clear MARK sections, consistent naming patterns, and well-structured Given/When/Then blocks, making the test file easy to navigate and understand.
Also applies to: 77-78, 188-189, 536-537
|
Test failures unrelated to changes; merging. |
lawrence-forooghian
deleted the
2028-bring-in-line-with-wrapper-sdk-proxy-spec
branch
Resolves #2028.
Summary by CodeRabbit