-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Some new vulns shortname #11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation. |
function insecurePassword(): string { | ||
// BAD: the random suffix is not cryptographically secure | ||
const suffix = Math.random(); | ||
const password = "myPassword" + suffix; |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Insecure randomness High
Math.random()
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix
AI about 2 months ago
To fix the problem, we need to replace the use of Math.random()
with a cryptographically secure random number generator. In Node.js, we can use the crypto
module's randomBytes
function to generate a secure random suffix. This will ensure that the generated password is not easily predictable.
- Import the
crypto
module at the beginning of the file. - Replace the
Math.random()
call withcrypto.randomBytes
to generate a secure random suffix. - Convert the random bytes to a suitable format for appending to the password string.
-
Copy modified line R4 -
Copy modified lines R23-R24
@@ -3,2 +3,3 @@ | ||
import fs from "fs"; | ||
import crypto from "crypto"; | ||
|
||
@@ -21,4 +22,4 @@ | ||
function insecurePassword(): string { | ||
// BAD: the random suffix is not cryptographically secure | ||
const suffix = Math.random(); | ||
// GOOD: the random suffix is cryptographically secure | ||
const suffix = crypto.randomBytes(4).toString('hex'); | ||
const password = "myPassword" + suffix; |
function insecurePassword(): string { | ||
// BAD: the random suffix is not cryptographically secure | ||
const suffix = Math.random(); | ||
const password = "myPassword" + suffix; |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Insecure randomness High
Math.random()
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix
AI about 2 months ago
To fix the problem, we need to replace the use of Math.random()
with a cryptographically secure random number generator. In a Node.js environment, we can use the crypto
module's randomBytes
method to generate secure random values. We will convert these bytes to a number to append to the password.
Specifically, we will:
- Import the
crypto
module. - Replace the
Math.random()
call with a call tocrypto.randomBytes
. - Convert the random bytes to a number suitable for appending to the password.
-
Copy modified line R5 -
Copy modified lines R29-R30
@@ -4,2 +4,3 @@ | ||
import type { HelperMetadata } from "./helpers-generated.ts"; | ||
import { randomBytes } from "crypto"; | ||
|
||
@@ -27,4 +28,4 @@ | ||
function insecurePassword(): string { | ||
// BAD: the random suffix is not cryptographically secure | ||
const suffix = Math.random(); | ||
// GOOD: the random suffix is cryptographically secure | ||
const suffix = randomBytes(4).readUInt32BE(0); | ||
const password = "myPassword" + suffix; |
v2 of this change
Filter not working correctly
https://github.com/advanced-security/sample-javascript-monorepo/security/code-scanning?query=is%3Aopen+pr%3A11+tag%3Aproject%2Fcli
tags are applied appropriately