refactor(workflow): add Jinja2 renderer abstraction for template transform#3
Conversation
…de and threaded it through DifyNodeFactory so TemplateTransform nodes receive the dependency by default, keeping behavior unchanged unless an override is provided. Changes are in `api/core/workflow/nodes/template_transform/template_transform_node.py` and `api/core/workflow/nodes/node_factory.py`. **Commits** - chore(workflow): identify TemplateTransform dependency on CodeExecutor - feat(workflow): add CodeExecutor constructor injection to TemplateTransformNode (defaulting to current behavior) - feat(workflow): inject CodeExecutor from DifyNodeFactory when creating TemplateTransform nodes **Tests** - Not run (not requested) Next step: run `make lint` and `make type-check` if you want to validate the backend checks.
…Transform to use it, keeping CodeExecutor as the default adapter while preserving current behavior. Updates are in `api/core/workflow/nodes/template_transform/template_renderer.py`, `api/core/workflow/nodes/template_transform/template_transform_node.py`, `api/core/workflow/nodes/node_factory.py`, and `api/tests/unit_tests/core/workflow/nodes/template_transform/template_transform_node_spec.py`. Commit-style summary: - feat(template-transform): add Jinja2 template renderer abstraction with CodeExecutor adapter - refactor(template-transform): use renderer in node/factory and update unit test patches Tests not run (not requested).
…ode creation to return TemplateTransformNode directly for template-transform nodes in `api/core/workflow/nodes/node_factory.py`. Commit-style summary: - refactor(template-transform): derive TemplateRenderError from ValueError - refactor(node-factory): instantiate TemplateTransformNode directly with injected renderer Tests not run (not requested).
…ts/core/workflow/nodes/template_transform/template_transform_node_spec.py`) chore(type-check): ran `make type-check` (basedpyright clean, 0 errors) No errors reported.
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 24297d2668
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| mock_execute.return_value = "<script>alert('xss')</script>" | ||
|
|
||
| node = TemplateTransformNode( | ||
| id="test_node", | ||
| config=node_data, | ||
| graph_init_params=graph_init_params, | ||
| graph=mock_graph, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Split test file to stay under 800 lines
The repo-root AGENTS.md rule 5 states that Python files under api/ must be under 800 lines. This test file is now 1151 lines after the added cases, so it violates the project’s compliance requirements and risks failing mandatory checks. Please split the added scenarios into additional test modules (same scope) to keep each file below 800 lines.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Benchmark PR from agentic-review-benchmarks#3