Fix: Use equal to compare lists #436
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
That would be #430. :) |
|
I see. You just didn't work on it yet. It's fine anyway, as you must be busy dealing with other issues. |
|
Yeah, I noticed this recently (or someone showed me, I forget), but this code has been incorrect for several releases without anyone noticing, including myself, so it doesn't seem urgent. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
eqis not a proper way to compare the structures of two Lisp objects. I spontaneously discovered this trivial mistake while investigating on another issue, but nobody pointed it out before?