Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move Apache HDFS to new provider structure #46140

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jason810496
Copy link
Contributor

related: #46045


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Jan 27, 2025

Rebased to account for HTTP fix in main

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Jan 27, 2025

conflicts.

@jason810496 jason810496 force-pushed the provider_moving/apache-hdfs branch 2 times, most recently from 722601f to 2176557 Compare January 28, 2025 16:28
@jscheffl jscheffl force-pushed the provider_moving/apache-hdfs branch from 2176557 to 6b8fd86 Compare January 28, 2025 19:19
@jason810496 jason810496 force-pushed the provider_moving/apache-hdfs branch from 6b8fd86 to db0537c Compare January 29, 2025 15:23
@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Jan 30, 2025

Conflicts - the tests should be green now

@jason810496 jason810496 force-pushed the provider_moving/apache-hdfs branch from db0537c to 89dbfa2 Compare January 30, 2025 02:55
@potiuk potiuk force-pushed the provider_moving/apache-hdfs branch 2 times, most recently from 0099cf6 to e6b015f Compare January 30, 2025 08:40
@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Jan 30, 2025

Conflicts.

@jason810496 jason810496 force-pushed the provider_moving/apache-hdfs branch from e6b015f to 4528c5e Compare January 30, 2025 12:55
Copy link
Contributor

@o-nikolas o-nikolas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fresh conflicts and needs one more rebase to get all the fixes from main branch.

@jason810496 jason810496 force-pushed the provider_moving/apache-hdfs branch 3 times, most recently from b77dd06 to 0a1dc31 Compare February 1, 2025 14:26
@jason810496
Copy link
Contributor Author

The Build documentation failure is caused by a doc issue in the Google Provider, and the Kubernetes tests failure is due to kerberos dependency error.

@potiuk potiuk force-pushed the provider_moving/apache-hdfs branch from 7c44112 to f7ffecf Compare February 1, 2025 22:22
@jason810496 jason810496 force-pushed the provider_moving/apache-hdfs branch from 43c4016 to cc0f491 Compare February 4, 2025 16:56
@potiuk potiuk force-pushed the provider_moving/apache-hdfs branch 2 times, most recently from d288310 to 28fef05 Compare February 6, 2025 12:37
@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Feb 6, 2025

There was a k8S problem fixed in main. Rebased to check if that solves the problems in this PR.

@potiuk potiuk force-pushed the provider_moving/apache-hdfs branch from 28fef05 to 96da731 Compare February 6, 2025 16:15
@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Feb 6, 2025

One more rebase

@jason810496 jason810496 force-pushed the provider_moving/apache-hdfs branch from 96da731 to 7069e09 Compare February 6, 2025 17:37
@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Feb 6, 2025

THis is REALLY strange those tests are failing - I tried to reproduce it and could not - so can you please rebaseit one more taime :) ?

@jason810496 jason810496 force-pushed the provider_moving/apache-hdfs branch from 7069e09 to 8d8cd6f Compare February 7, 2025 03:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants