Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add option in auth managers to specify DB manager #48196

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2025

Conversation

vincbeck
Copy link
Contributor

Follow of #48070 (review).

Some auth manager require a DB manager to be used in the environment. Instead of delegating this to users to set the correct DB manager in the config, the auth manager can set it directly.

Example: if one uses FAB auth manager, FABDBManager needs to be configured. With this change, the user does not need to add FABDBManager as part of [database] external_db_managers, the auth manager does it automatically.


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

@vincbeck vincbeck force-pushed the vincbeck/am_db_manager branch from a4a8896 to cdfa0a2 Compare March 24, 2025 20:12
@vincbeck vincbeck merged commit a4f089e into apache:main Mar 24, 2025
89 checks passed
@vincbeck vincbeck deleted the vincbeck/am_db_manager branch March 24, 2025 21:02
prabhusneha pushed a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2025
pankajkoti pushed a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2025
shubham-pyc pushed a commit to shubham-pyc/airflow that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2025
nailo2c pushed a commit to nailo2c/airflow that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants