Skip to content

[v3-0-test] Move costraint check to breeze (#52696) - #52715

Merged
potiuk merged 1 commit into
v3-0-testfrom
backport-906da03-v3-0-test
Jul 2, 2025
Merged

potiuk merged 1 commit into
v3-0-testfrom
backport-906da03-v3-0-test

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actions github-actions Bot commented Jul 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We started to copy more and more code from breeze utils to the
constraint generation script - including using github token for
pulling constraints files, reading python version, running command
etc - so it's now the time to move the constraint check to become
a regular breeze command and import utils from breeze utils.

We are running the command in the CI image which has both
advantages and disadvantages - it's a bit slower and requires
the CI image to be built for the right Python version but it
makes sure that the outputs are reproducible across different
OS's and system libraries.
(cherry picked from commit 906da03)

Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk jarek@potiuk.com

We started to copy more and more code from breeze utils to the
constraint generation script - including using github token for
pulling constraints files, reading python version, running command
etc - so it's now the time to move the constraint check to become
a regular breeze command and import utils from breeze utils.

We are running the command in the CI image which has both
advantages and disadvantages - it's a bit slower and requires
the CI image to be built for the right Python version but it
makes sure that the outputs are reproducible across different
OS's and system libraries.
(cherry picked from commit 906da03)

Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
@potiuk
potiuk marked this pull request as ready for review July 2, 2025 14:30
@potiuk
potiuk merged commit 1985fd1 into v3-0-test Jul 2, 2025
@potiuk
potiuk deleted the backport-906da03-v3-0-test branch July 2, 2025 14:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant