Export StoreScope from airflow.sdk as public interface - #73600
Merged
Merged
Conversation
kaxil
approved these changes
Sep 23, 2026
jroachgolf84
approved these changes
Sep 23, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
Custom state backends have to annotate all eight
BaseStoreBackendmethods with theTaskScope | AssetScopeunion, but the SDK only exported the two members, not the union itself. The single public name was missing, so the only way to get it was the private_sharedpath, which the object storage backend was already depending on.airflow.statealready re-exported it on the core side; this brings the SDK in line.{pr_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments. You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you know the PR number.