We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Steps to reproduce the issue
expected:
actual:
VPC VR
4.19
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
it looks the issue is because of the order of rules
root@r-10-VM:~#iptables-save |grep FORWARD :FORWARD ACCEPT [97:8028] -A FORWARD -j VPN_STATS_eth1 -A FORWARD -j VPN_STATS_eth2 :FORWARD DROP [95:7876] -A FORWARD -j NETWORK_STATS_eth2 -A FORWARD -j NETWORK_STATS_eth1 -A FORWARD -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -s 172.18.0.0/20 ! -d 172.18.0.0/20 -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -d 10.200.0.0/24 -o eth2 -j ACL_INBOUND_eth2 -A FORWARD -d 172.18.1.0/24 -o eth3 -j ACL_INBOUND_eth3
because of
-A FORWARD -s 172.18.0.0/20 ! -d 172.18.0.0/20 -j ACCEPT
the packet from vm to private gateway is accepted, so that the next rule becomes useless
-A FORWARD -d 10.200.0.0/24 -o eth2 -j ACL_INBOUND_eth2
Sorry, something went wrong.
weizhouapache
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Steps to reproduce the issue
expected:
actual:
ISSUE TYPE
COMPONENT NAME
CLOUDSTACK VERSION
CONFIGURATION
OS / ENVIRONMENT
SUMMARY
STEPS TO REPRODUCE
EXPECTED RESULTS
ACTUAL RESULTS
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: