-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
kvm: fix volume migration across cluster-scope pools #10266
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
kvm: fix volume migration across cluster-scope pools #10266
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.19 #10266 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 15.14% 15.14%
+ Complexity 11283 11281 -2
=========================================
Files 5408 5408
Lines 473822 473843 +21
Branches 57825 57827 +2
=========================================
+ Hits 71762 71769 +7
- Misses 394037 394049 +12
- Partials 8023 8025 +2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@blueorangutan package |
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 12202 |
@weizhouapache is this ready for review? |
yes @Pearl1594 |
@blueorangutan package |
@Pearl1594 a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 12559 |
@blueorangutan test keepEnv |
@Pearl1594 a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
@weizhouapache could you explain a bit about how your patch fixes the problem and which tests did you do to verify it? |
@JoaoJandre when migrate volume from a cluster-wide storage to another cluster-wide storage in another cluster, we should treat it as similar as migration between local storages, because the source host is not able to mount the destination pool, although it is shared(e.g. nfs). I have verified the volume migrations between nfs/nfs,nfs/lcoal,local/local storage across clusters. |
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-12490)
|
@weizhouapache Could you please check if the test failures are in any way related to this PR. I thought they weren't, but would like your confirmation.
|
@Pearl1594 @blueorangutan test |
@weizhouapache a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
I see, thank you for the explanations :-) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
clgtm
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
code LGTM
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-12496)
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tested. Cross-cluster migration works.
Description
This PR fixes #10078
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?