Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

4.19 merge #10303

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: 4.20
Choose a base branch
from
Open

4.19 merge #10303

wants to merge 12 commits into from

Conversation

DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR intends to deal with a set of merge conflicts

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • build/CI
  • test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

shwstppr and others added 12 commits January 29, 2025 13:14
* server: fix attach uploaded volume

Fixes #10120

When an uploaded volume is attached to a VM for which no existing volume
can be found it was resulting in error. For such volumes, server needs
to find a suitable pool first and copy them to the pool from secondary
store.

Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>

* fix

Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>

* fix

Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>

* add unit tests

Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Boris Stoyanov - a.k.a Bobby <[email protected]>
return String.format("UserAccount %s.", ReflectionToStringBuilderUtils.reflectOnlySelectedFields
(this, "id", "uuid", "username", "accountName"));
}

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member

@weizhouapache weizhouapache left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we "squash and merge" this pr ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants