Skip to content

server: fix conserve_mode of DefaultIsolatedNetworkOfferingForVpcNetworks #11133

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

weizhouapache
Copy link
Member

Description

This PR fixes the conserve_mode of network offering DefaultIsolatedNetworkOfferingForVpcNetworks is still 0 in fresh installation

mysql> select conserve_mode  from `cloud`.`network_offerings` where name='DefaultIsolatedNetworkOfferingForVpcNetworks'\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
conserve_mode: 0
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • build/CI
  • test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

@weizhouapache
Copy link
Member Author

I am so sorry, this is the 3rd PR for the same issue

🤦

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 3, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 16.57%. Comparing base (be22bfe) to head (af3dead).
Report is 31 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##               main   #11133    +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage     16.57%   16.57%            
- Complexity    13971    13987    +16     
==========================================
  Files          5743     5745     +2     
  Lines        510648   510847   +199     
  Branches      62105    62140    +35     
==========================================
+ Hits          84641    84696    +55     
- Misses       416534   416677   +143     
- Partials       9473     9474     +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 3.91% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
unittests 17.47% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Contributor

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clgtm, and would this be the last one? ;)

@weizhouapache
Copy link
Member Author

clgtm, and would this be the last one? ;)

hope so @DaanHoogland
😆

@sureshanaparti
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@sureshanaparti a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 14036

@weizhouapache
Copy link
Member Author

@blueorangutan test

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@weizhouapache a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-13687)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 52969 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr11133-t13687-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 141 look OK, 0 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File

@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added component:integration-test Python Warning... Python code Ahead! labels Jul 7, 2025
@weizhouapache
Copy link
Member Author

@blueorangutan package

@weizhouapache
Copy link
Member Author

@DaanHoogland @sureshanaparti
I updated a smoke test to test the conserve mode, hope the issue will be fixed PERMANENTLY.

@weizhouapache weizhouapache marked this pull request as ready for review July 7, 2025 11:33
@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 14070

@weizhouapache
Copy link
Member Author

@blueorangutan test

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@weizhouapache a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-13707)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 52938 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr11133-t13707-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 140 look OK, 1 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File
test_network_acl Error 111.36 test_network_acl.py

@weizhouapache weizhouapache marked this pull request as draft July 10, 2025 07:03
@weizhouapache
Copy link
Member Author

@blueorangutan LLtest keepEnv

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@weizhouapache a [LL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests

Copy link

This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.

@sureshanaparti
Copy link
Contributor

@weizhouapache can you check the conflicts

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants