Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Copy on pool host when storage pool has ScopeType.HOST #9356

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 10, 2024

Conversation

rg9975
Copy link
Contributor

@rg9975 rg9975 commented Jul 8, 2024

Description

This PR fixes an issue with storage volume migrations when a storage pool (source or destination) has ScopeType.HOST set. Prior to this PR, the code in StorageSystemDataMotionStrategy selected any host in the cluster if the source storage pool did not have a cluster ID, or a host in the cluster if it did. This effectively breaks ScopeType.HOST copies except when the selection resulted in the specific host the other storage pool resides on.

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • build/CI
  • test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

How Has This Been Tested?

Performed copies between a local KVM storage pool and a FiberChannelAdapter storage pool.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature.
@rohityadavcloud
Copy link
Member

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@rohityadavcloud a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 9, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 15.07%. Comparing base (f381763) to head (e0f80db).
Report is 1 commits behind head on 4.19.

Files Patch % Lines
...torage/motion/StorageSystemDataMotionStrategy.java 0.00% 7 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               4.19    #9356      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     15.07%   15.07%   -0.01%     
+ Complexity    11169    11164       -5     
============================================
  Files          5405     5405              
  Lines        472667   472671       +4     
  Branches      60866    58314    -2552     
============================================
- Hits          71269    71252      -17     
- Misses       393468   393492      +24     
+ Partials       7930     7927       -3     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 4.27% <ø> (ø)
unittests 15.79% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@sureshanaparti
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@sureshanaparti a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

Copy link
Contributor

@sureshanaparti sureshanaparti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clgtm

@sureshanaparti sureshanaparti requested a review from shwstppr July 9, 2024 04:12
Copy link
Contributor

@shwstppr shwstppr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code LGTM

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 10299

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 10302

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-10775)

@rohityadavcloud
Copy link
Member

@blueorangutan test matrix

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@rohityadavcloud a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos7 mgmt + xenserver71, rocky8 mgmt + vmware67u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-10777)

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-10779)

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-10778)

@rohityadavcloud
Copy link
Member

@blueorangutan test matrix

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@rohityadavcloud a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos7 mgmt + xenserver71, rocky8 mgmt + vmware67u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-10780)
Environment: xenserver-71 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 40435 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr9356-t10780-xenserver-71.zip
Smoke tests completed. 132 look OK, 0 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-10781)
Environment: vmware-67u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server r8
Total time taken: 45159 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr9356-t10781-vmware-67u3.zip
Smoke tests completed. 128 look OK, 4 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File
test_DeployVmAntiAffinityGroup_in_project Error 112.41 test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_DeployVmAntiAffinityGroup Error 45.05 test_affinity_groups.py
test_03_deploy_and_scale_kubernetes_cluster Failure 46.37 test_kubernetes_clusters.py
test_08_upgrade_kubernetes_ha_cluster Failure 0.08 test_kubernetes_clusters.py
test_01_non_strict_host_anti_affinity Failure 148.40 test_nonstrict_affinity_group.py
test_02_non_strict_host_affinity Error 104.23 test_nonstrict_affinity_group.py

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-10782)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 45887 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr9356-t10782-kvm-centos7.zip
Smoke tests completed. 129 look OK, 3 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File
test_01_secure_vm_migration Error 134.11 test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_secure_vm_migration Error 134.11 test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_cancel_host_maintenace_with_migration_jobs Error 239.15 test_host_maintenance.py
test_hostha_kvm_host_fencing Error 108.47 test_hostha_kvm.py

@sureshanaparti
Copy link
Contributor

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-10782) Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7 Total time taken: 45887 seconds Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr9356-t10782-kvm-centos7.zip Smoke tests completed. 129 look OK, 3 have errors, 0 did not run Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File
test_01_secure_vm_migration Error 134.11 test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_secure_vm_migration Error 134.11 test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_cancel_host_maintenace_with_migration_jobs Error 239.15 test_host_maintenance.py
test_hostha_kvm_host_fencing Error 108.47 test_hostha_kvm.py

verified locally, there are intermittent. test_01_secure_vm_migration fails during tear down of VM as router is in Starting start (and unable to update the rules).

@sureshanaparti sureshanaparti merged commit 32cc1d4 into apache:4.19 Jul 10, 2024
24 of 26 checks passed
dhslove pushed a commit to ablecloud-team/ablestack-cloud that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2024
@rg9975 rg9975 deleted the 4.19_HOSTSCOPECOPY branch January 31, 2025 17:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
No open projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants