Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

branch-2.0: [Bug](function) fix wrong result when case when have more than 256 conditions and the… #47179 #47395

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: branch-2.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

BiteTheDDDDt
Copy link
Contributor

Cherry-picked from #47179

…nditions and the… (apache#47179)

### What problem does this PR solve?
fix wrong result when case when have more than 256 conditions and then
column is not nullable
### Check List (For Author)

- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
    - [x] Regression test
    - [ ] Unit Test
    - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
        - [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
        - [ ] No code files have been changed.
        - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason?  -->

- Behavior changed:
    - [x] No.
    - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->

- Does this need documentation?
    - [x] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
apache/doris-website#1214 -->

### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
@Thearas
Copy link
Contributor

Thearas commented Jan 24, 2025

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@BiteTheDDDDt BiteTheDDDDt changed the base branch from master to branch-2.0 January 24, 2025 03:50
@BiteTheDDDDt
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

2 similar comments
@BiteTheDDDDt
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@BiteTheDDDDt
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants