You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was working on something similar a while back. Maybe these changes will help you #14834. What I found was that the speed improvements weren't a lot for MSQ because transfer manager in the SDK v1(?) didn't parallelize if the downloads were chunked. It helped a bit when segments were getting downloaded and uploaded. However, for some reason, segments uploaded without the transfer manager were slowly downloaded when downloaded with the transfer manager.
As such, it would be really cool if you can benchmark the performance of the changes, along with speedups/slowdown when downloaded and uploaded pre-post your patch.
I was working on something similar a while back. Maybe these changes will help you #14834. What I found was that the speed improvements weren't a lot for MSQ because transfer manager in the SDK v1(?) didn't parallelize if the downloads were chunked. It helped a bit when segments were getting downloaded and uploaded. However, for some reason, segments uploaded without the transfer manager were slowly downloaded when downloaded with the transfer manager. As such, it would be really cool if you can benchmark the performance of the changes, along with speedups/slowdown when downloaded and uploaded pre-post your patch.
@LakshSingla, Thanks for the suggestions.
Right now, My changes are focussed on optimizing the uploads.
I will try to come up with some existing benchmarks or create a new one for transfer manager.
Description
Motivation
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: