Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[perf] Benchmark for Filter Performance for an Immutable Segment #14745

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ankitsultana
Copy link
Contributor

@ankitsultana ankitsultana commented Jan 3, 2025

A simple benchmark that can be used to test the performance of a filter expression against a given segment.

The test takes two parameters: the location of the segment and the filter expression.

TODO: Switch to @Param instead of env vars.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 3, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 63.85%. Comparing base (59551e4) to head (94596eb).
Report is 1528 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #14745      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     61.75%   63.85%   +2.09%     
- Complexity      207     1607    +1400     
============================================
  Files          2436     2703     +267     
  Lines        133233   150732   +17499     
  Branches      20636    23290    +2654     
============================================
+ Hits          82274    96243   +13969     
- Misses        44911    47291    +2380     
- Partials       6048     7198    +1150     
Flag Coverage Δ
custom-integration1 100.00% <ø> (+99.99%) ⬆️
integration 100.00% <ø> (+99.99%) ⬆️
integration1 100.00% <ø> (+99.99%) ⬆️
integration2 0.00% <ø> (ø)
java-11 63.79% <ø> (+2.09%) ⬆️
java-21 63.73% <ø> (+2.10%) ⬆️
skip-bytebuffers-false 63.84% <ø> (+2.09%) ⬆️
skip-bytebuffers-true 56.09% <ø> (+28.36%) ⬆️
temurin 63.85% <ø> (+2.09%) ⬆️
unittests 63.84% <ø> (+2.09%) ⬆️
unittests1 56.27% <ø> (+9.38%) ⬆️
unittests2 34.17% <ø> (+6.44%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants