Skip to content

Conversation

@Gta103
Copy link

@Gta103 Gta103 commented May 29, 2025

This AIP proposes a weighted reward distribution system that allocates rewards to users based on their activity level and the length of time their assets are locked. By combining these two factors, the mechanism incentivizes both active participation and long-term commitment, resulting in a fairer and more effective rewards allocation. This approach aims to boost network engagement and stability by rewarding users who contribute consistently and stake their assets for extended periods.

Gta103 added 2 commits May 29, 2025 12:00
This AIP proposes a weighted reward distribution system that allocates rewards to users based on their activity level and the length of time their assets are locked. By combining these two factors, the mechanism incentivizes both active participation and long-term commitment, resulting in a fairer and more effective rewards allocation. This approach aims to boost network engagement and stability by rewarding users who contribute consistently and stake their assets for extended periods.
This update introduces a major enhancement to the AIP titled “Weighted Reward Distribution Based on Activity and Lock Duration.” It improves both technical clarity and governance relevance.
@Gta103 Gta103 changed the title Weighted Reward Distribution Based on Activity and Lock Duration AIP 666 -weighted Reward Distribution Based on Activity and Lock Duration Jun 5, 2025
@MoonShiesty
Copy link
Contributor

i like the direction of this AIP

i know we could implement a way to measure staking duration but im not sure how feasible it would be to measure active participation

active participation

how do we measure active participation?

another approach could be to rewards protocols with gas rebates for transactions they originate

this would give apps with large transaction flow like aggregators an incentive to originate more transactions

@Gta103
Copy link
Author

Gta103 commented Oct 6, 2025

Yes I add another option of rewards

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants