feat(SetComp): Add support for set comprehensions and necessary tests

[nagajaideep]

Pull Request description

This PR introduces support for set comprehensions in ASTx by adding a SetComp literal representation and its corresponding SetCompType. It also enhances type inference for set comprehensions and includes necessary test cases.

This PR aims to Solve #197

How to test these changes

• Run the test suite:

  pytest tests/datatypes/test_flows.py
  pre-commit run --all-files
  

Pull Request checklists

Note:

• Share updated images of the graph representation of the new ASTx node
  proposed in this PR, in both image and ASCII formats. For more
  information, check this Google Colab notebook:
  https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1xXwHmOMkJKFSmhRvn4WYfSAsdDzMnawf?usp=sharing

Test basic creation and properties of SetComprehension.
OLD:

NEW:

Test SetComprehension with multiple generators.

Test SetComprehension with a non-numeric element type.

This PR is a:

• bug-fix
• new feature
• maintenance

About this PR:

• it includes tests.
• the tests are executed on CI.
• the tests generate log file(s) (path).
• pre-commit hooks were executed locally.
• this PR requires a project documentation update.

Author's checklist:

• I have reviewed the changes and it contains no misspelling.
• The code is well commented, especially in the parts that contain more
  complexity.
• New and old tests passed locally.

Additional information

Reviewer's checklist

Copy and paste this template for your review's note:

## Reviewer's Checklist

- [ ] I managed to reproduce the problem locally from the `main` branch
- [ ] I managed to test the new changes locally
- [ ] I confirm that the issues mentioned were fixed/resolved .

[xmnlab]

hi @nagajaideep , there are a few git conflicts here.
I am changing this pr to draft, feel free to change it to "ready for review" and ping me after your rebase it and it is ready again for review.

[nagajaideep]

Thanks for the update! I’m working on the proposal reformatting as suggested. I’ll resolve the conflicts, rebase the branch, and mark it as Ready for Review soon. Will ping you once both are ready!

[xmnlab]

@nagajaideep could you rebase yoru branch on top of the upstream main please?

[xmnlab]

@nagajaideep

I just merged this PR: #245

let me know if it clear now. sorry for the confusion.

[nagajaideep]

No issues ivan
I will rebase and update my implementation ASAP