All-units prebuilt header error on pascal on MSVC

[connorjak]

When using https://aurora-opensource.github.io/au/0.3.5/au_all_units.hh with my C++20 project, I get these errors, only on the pascal definition. I was originally on a different commit version of the file, and after the change to 0.3.5 proper it had the exact same errors. If I rename pascal to pascal2, the error goes away. Maybe there's a shadowed type, keyword, or global here, somehow?

Au\au_all_units.h(6087): error C2059: syntax error: '='
Au\au_all_units.h(6087): error C2143: syntax error: missing ';' before '{'
Au\au_all_units.h(6087): error C2447: '{': missing function header (old-style formal list?)

Compile info:

• Windows 11
• RelWithDebInfo Configuration
• Toolchain: msvc_x64_64
• MSVC v143 - VS 2022 17.10.3
• cl version 14.40
• CMake build through Visual Studio's CMake support (Ninja)
• CMake configuration:

set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD 20) 
set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD_REQUIRED ON)
set(CMAKE_CXX_EXTENSIONS OFF)
set(CMAKE_POSITION_INDEPENDENT_CODE ON)

[connorjak]

Reproduced it in a simpler project with C++17. Windows macros strike again!

[connorjak]

#undef pascal after including Windows.h or similar does the trick.

[chiphogg]

A lowercase-named macro? The monsters!

I think we'll have to handle this the same way we did PI. That is, we'll [[deprecate]] it and stick it inside of an #ifndef pascal block for now, and then remove it outright once it's been deprecated for a full minor release version.

Thanks for finding the problem and tracking down the root cause!

[chiphogg]

I thought we had fixed this in #285, but this compiler explorer link suggests it may still be a problem. Adding #undef pascal after "Windows.h" appears to still be necessary.

Did we miss something?

[connorjak]

I thought we had fixed this in #285, but this compiler explorer link suggests it may still be a problem. Adding #undef pascal after "Windows.h" appears to still be necessary.

Did we miss something?

I don't use compiler explorer very often; can you show me what is going wrong?

[chiphogg]

Well, that is very strange. Nothing appears to be wrong anymore. Although really, I guess the strange part is that it appeared to be broken after landing in the first place --- we really did expect this PR to fix the issue.

If you want to see what the problem was, you can replace main with 0.3.5 in the #include URL for Au. The error I'm getting there looks the same as what I had been seeing before.

In any case, I think this is fixed for real now!