-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Avoid colliding with macro names B1
and PI
#247
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure if this is a perfect solution. It would depend on the order of includes. The order of headers is not great to reason about.
I don't have great ideas for alternative solutions 😓
kBlah
. It generally won't collide with macros, but it is ugly.PI
to something likeAUPI
. It would be unique, but it's more verbose and farther from the simple Greek letter. Also, that is what namespaces are for 😄There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Having slept on this, I'm leaning towards Option 4: just don't define
PI
. Using really short all-caps names is a recipe for collision with poorly designed frameworks. That's not to say we'll never do it, but it seems wise to minimize how much we do it. And in this case, we have a clear collision with the Arduino framework, which we'd really like to support, so I think ourPI
has to go.I'll deprecate it in a follow on PR for ease of review. I think we'll still want to retain the
#ifndef
guards until we remove it entirely (probably in 0.4.0).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm leaning towards 1. It adds one ugly character, but it is consistent and reduces conflicts.
Deleting it for now buys us time. It's a good idea to minimize Au's public API. At some point, we should design a path forward for constants that works for most users.