Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: add DS integ test for parent ID query #1694

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main-v0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Jordan-Nelson
Copy link
Member

Issue #, if available: N/A

Description of changes:

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@Jordan-Nelson Jordan-Nelson marked this pull request as ready for review June 7, 2022 18:55
@Jordan-Nelson Jordan-Nelson requested a review from a team as a code owner June 7, 2022 18:55
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #1694 (f4dc5b1) into main (545c9bc) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1694      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   42.53%   42.54%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         376      375       -1     
  Lines       10866    10863       -3     
==========================================
  Hits         4622     4622              
+ Misses       6244     6241       -3     
Flag Coverage Δ
android-unit-tests ∅ <ø> (∅)
flutter-unit-tests 31.52% <ø> (ø)
ios-unit-tests 89.04% <ø> (+0.12%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
..._pinpoint_ios/example/ios/Runner/AppDelegate.swift

Copy link
Member

@HuiSF HuiSF left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for adding this.
1 nit-picking comment

Comment on lines +105 to +107
expect(posts.contains(testPost1), isTrue);
expect(posts.contains(testPost2), isTrue);
expect(posts.contains(testPost3), isFalse);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit:

Suggested change
expect(posts.contains(testPost1), isTrue);
expect(posts.contains(testPost2), isTrue);
expect(posts.contains(testPost3), isFalse);
expect(posts, containsAll([testPost1, testPost2]));
expect(posts, isNot(contains(testPost3)));

@dnys1
Copy link
Contributor

dnys1 commented Nov 16, 2022

@Jordan-Nelson can this be closed or should it be reviewed?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants