-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 82
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ScriptEngine API Fixes #231
Open
akbertram
wants to merge
4
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
script-engine-fixes
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f17166b
Issue #201: Wrap EvalException in ScriptException
peter-gergely-horvath 5020536
Ensure that scriptEngine.getBindings() and scriptEngine.getContext().…
akbertram 44cf5f1
adjust the tests and let them pass
Alain-Bearez d54f359
Merge pull request #367 from FOR-Scala/script-engine-fixes
akbertram File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@peter-gergely-horvath does the API require that value from
get(key)
is equal to the original value set?Renjin's implementation automatically converts scalars like instances of
java.lang.String
or `java.lang.Number' to an R object (org.renjin.sexp.SEXP), so what you put in does not always equal what you get out.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
According to the Javadoc:
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/javax/script/ScriptEngine.html#get-java.lang.String-
This makes sense if you consider as example an implementation for the JavaScript language: while you put a string value for a key in your bindings, the execution of some script might result in the variable to get an array value.
As a consequence, the assertions on lines 165 and 167 have to be rewritten considering the fact that Renjin wraps the given
java.lang.String
value into an expression of typeStringArrayVector
.