Add optional cloud framework and finalize MCP v2 readiness - #62
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Why
Users may want shared remote access to recon from the AI client of their choice. A single model-neutral MCP endpoint is the most portable direction, but the repository must not imply that a real provider deployment has already been validated. The final MCP v2 release also made the prior beta compatibility references stale.
Impact
Local installation and local CLI or stdio MCP behavior remain unchanged. The remote runtime and infrastructure are entirely optional. The Cloud Run files are a directionally useful draft, not a production-readiness claim or project-operated service.
Validation
uv run python scripts/check.py: all stages passed