This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 19, 2022. It is now read-only.
🚨 [security] Update rack: 2.0.4 → 2.0.9.1 (minor)#90
Open
depfu[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
Open
🚨 [security] Update rack: 2.0.4 → 2.0.9.1 (minor)#90depfu[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
depfu[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🚨 Your current dependencies have known security vulnerabilities 🚨
This dependency update fixes known security vulnerabilities. Please see the details below and assess their impact carefully. We recommend to merge and deploy this as soon as possible!
Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.
What changed?
Security Advisories 🚨
🚨 Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Multipart Parsing
🚨 Possible shell escape sequence injection vulnerability in Rack
🚨 Possible information leak / session hijack vulnerability
🚨 Possible XSS vulnerability in Rack
🚨 Possible DoS vulnerability in Rack
Release Notes
2.0.8 (from changelog)
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 37 commits:
update changelogbump versionEscape untrusted text when loggingRestrict broken mime parsingbump versionHandle case where session id key is requested but it is missingMerge pull request #1455 from trainline-eu/2-0-stableMerge pull request #1462 from jeremyevans/sessionid-to_sAdded support for SameSite=None cookie value, added in revision 3 of rfc6265bisBumping versionIntroduce a new base class to avoid breaking when upgradingAdd a version prefix to the private id to make easier to migrate old valuesFallback to the public id when reading the session in the pool adapterAlso drop the session with the public id when destroying sessionsFallback to the legacy id when the new id is not foundAdd the private idrevert conditionals to masterremove NullSessionremove || raise and get closer to masterstore hashed id, send public iduse session id objectsremove more nilstry to ensure we always have some kind of objectBumping to 2.0.7 for releaseMerge pull request #1343 from larsxschneider/ls/forward-fixPreserve forwarded IP address for trusted proxy chainsMerge pull request #1201 from janko-m/make-multipart-parsing-work-for-chunked-requestsBumping version for releaseWhitelist http/https schemesReduce buffer size to avoid pathological parsingMerge tag '2.0.5' into 2-0-stableMerge pull request #1296 from tomelm/fix-prefers-plaintextBump version for releaseMerge pull request #1268 from eileencodes/forwardport-pr-1249-to-2-0-stableMerge pull request #1249 from mclark/handle-invalid-method-parametersStick with a passing version of Rubygems and bundlerLeahize👉 No CI detected
You don't seem to have any Continuous Integration service set up!
Without a service that will test the Depfu branches and pull requests, we can't inform you if incoming updates actually work with your app. We think that this degrades the service we're trying to provide down to a point where it is more or less meaningless.
This is fine if you just want to give Depfu a quick try. If you want to really let Depfu help you keep your app up-to-date, we recommend setting up a CI system:
depfu/.Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
@depfu rebase.All Depfu comment commands