Skip to content

feat(billing): rate archived usage periods (Phase 2 Rating)#972

Draft
law-chain-hot wants to merge 1 commit into
codex/billing-v3-pr1-usagefrom
codex/billing-v3-pr2-rating
Draft

feat(billing): rate archived usage periods (Phase 2 Rating)#972
law-chain-hot wants to merge 1 commit into
codex/billing-v3-pr1-usagefrom
codex/billing-v3-pr2-rating

Conversation

@law-chain-hot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • add versioned pricing plans with effective time ranges
  • convert archived Box usage periods into immutable rated periods
  • preserve pricing snapshots so historical charges remain explainable

Stack

Validation

  • Rating focused tests: 15/15 passed

Review

Review only the diff against codex/billing-v3-pr1-usage.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: ee92613f-2a76-4ec2-9689-4c2cca28db27

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/billing-v3-pr2-rating

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@law-chain-hot law-chain-hot changed the title feat(billing): rate archived usage periods feat(billing): rate archived usage periods (Phase 2 Rating) Jul 11, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant