Skip to content

Kinetic experimental v3 alpha1 check versions#11

Open
johannesschrimpf wants to merge 5 commits intobulwahn:kinetic-experimental-v3-alpha1from
BluEye-Robotics:kinetic-experimental-v3-alpha1-check-versions
Open

Kinetic experimental v3 alpha1 check versions#11
johannesschrimpf wants to merge 5 commits intobulwahn:kinetic-experimental-v3-alpha1from
BluEye-Robotics:kinetic-experimental-v3-alpha1-check-versions

Conversation

@johannesschrimpf
Copy link

Add script for version check

check-version.py polls the official rosdistro file and compares the
version numbers in the meta layer with the official versions.

Usage:
List all versions:                  ./check-versions.py list (--details)
List all versions that don't match: ./check-versions.py mismatch (--details)
Update recipe to dist version:      ./check-versions.py update <package> (--downgrade)
Update all recipes to dist version: ./check-versions.py update-all (--downgrade)

@bulwahn
Copy link
Owner

bulwahn commented Dec 9, 2017

I have seen the pull request for the indigo branch. As I regularly just rebase the kinetic branch (v3 stands for the third rebase already). Once the pull request is merged in indigo, it will be included in kinetic as well as soon as I rebase this branch and publish it under kinetic-experimental-v4.

@johannesschrimpf
Copy link
Author

Ok, just remember to set the distribution variable to kinetic after merging/rebasing so it checks against the right repo. It would be nice to read the distribution from the layer, but it still states indigo in the layer configuration. Is there a reason for that?

@bulwahn
Copy link
Owner

bulwahn commented Dec 11, 2017

Well, updating this variable in the layer.conf has just been overlooked. The branch is currently still experimental! The patch that updates the layer.conf has just been merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

Comments