-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
ci: Add contributor license agreement check #1850
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
a7a382e
4a721af
8d501f0
f857f80
927f88e
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ | ||
| name: cla-check | ||
|
|
||
| on: | ||
| pull_request: | ||
| workflow_dispatch: | ||
|
|
||
| permissions: {} | ||
|
|
||
| jobs: | ||
| cla-check: | ||
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
| steps: | ||
| - name: Check if CLA signed | ||
| uses: canonical/has-signed-canonical-cla@5d1443b94417bd150ad234a82fe21f7340a25e4d # v2.1.0 | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. minor:
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'd be on board with an entry for
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I wondered about that. You'd hope that we could. It feels pretty broad, but I guess it's sending the wrong message if we don't :) |
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems a bit odd... what would be checked?
Perhaps authors of the last NN commits?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was thinking it would be useful if it failed, then the contributor signed the CLA, and we could run it manually. But maybe we can just re-run the failed check, so that would be sufficient.