feat: Implement Formal Verification and Harden Flash Loan Logic (#126)#320
Open
nuhumusamagaji wants to merge 2 commits intoceejaylaboratory:mainfrom
Open
feat: Implement Formal Verification and Harden Flash Loan Logic (#126)#320nuhumusamagaji wants to merge 2 commits intoceejaylaboratory:mainfrom
feat: Implement Formal Verification and Harden Flash Loan Logic (#126)#320nuhumusamagaji wants to merge 2 commits intoceejaylaboratory:mainfrom
Conversation
- Added checked arithmetic to prevent overflow/underflow in fee calculations and repayment checks. - Added Kani formal verification proofs in src/flash_loan/verification.rs. - Proven atomic repayment enforcement and overflow safety. - Verified reentrancy resistance due to stateless contract design. - Added implementation plan and documentation.
|
@nuhumusamagaji Great news! 🎉 Based on an automated assessment of this PR, the linked Wave issue(s) no longer count against your application limits. You can now already apply to more issues while waiting for a review of this PR. Keep up the great work! 🚀 |
Author
|
Hello Maintainer, please review the PR as i have resolved the issue so i can get my point |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🚀 Overview
This PR addresses issue #126 by hardening the Flash Loan provider contract against arithmetic vulnerabilities and introducing formal verification proofs using the Kani model checker. The implementation ensures that the flash loan logic is mathematically sound, safe from overflows, and correctly enforces atomic repayment.
🛡️ Security Improvements
checked_mul,checked_div, andchecked_addinsrc/flash_loan/lib.rs. This prevents potential overflow/underflow attacks that could occur with very large loan amounts or balances.flash_loancall. Since the provider contract is stateless (no storage used during the execution) and relies on local stack variables for balance checks, it is inherently resistant to reentrancy attacks in the Soroban host environment.🧪 Formal Verification (Kani Proofs)
Introduced a new verification suite in
src/flash_loan/verification.rsthat includes:i128inputs.initial_balance + fee, preventing any logic leaks.📝 Changes
src/flash_loan/lib.rs(Hardened logic & documentation)src/flash_loan/verification.rs(Formal proofs)implementation_plan.md(Detailed verification strategy)✅ Verification Results
src/flash_loan/tests.rspassed.🔗 Related Issues
Fixes #126