Skip to content

feat: Implement Formal Verification and Harden Flash Loan Logic (#126)#320

Open
nuhumusamagaji wants to merge 2 commits intoceejaylaboratory:mainfrom
nuhumusamagaji:fix/flash-loan-formal-verification
Open

feat: Implement Formal Verification and Harden Flash Loan Logic (#126)#320
nuhumusamagaji wants to merge 2 commits intoceejaylaboratory:mainfrom
nuhumusamagaji:fix/flash-loan-formal-verification

Conversation

@nuhumusamagaji
Copy link
Copy Markdown

🚀 Overview

This PR addresses issue #126 by hardening the Flash Loan provider contract against arithmetic vulnerabilities and introducing formal verification proofs using the Kani model checker. The implementation ensures that the flash loan logic is mathematically sound, safe from overflows, and correctly enforces atomic repayment.

🛡️ Security Improvements

  • Checked Arithmetic: Replaced standard arithmetic operators with checked_mul, checked_div, and checked_add in src/flash_loan/lib.rs. This prevents potential overflow/underflow attacks that could occur with very large loan amounts or balances.
  • Reentrancy Protection: Performed an architectural audit of the flash_loan call. Since the provider contract is stateless (no storage used during the execution) and relies on local stack variables for balance checks, it is inherently resistant to reentrancy attacks in the Soroban host environment.
  • Explicit Failure Modes: Added descriptive panic messages for arithmetic failures to improve debuggability and ensure transaction atomicity.

🧪 Formal Verification (Kani Proofs)

Introduced a new verification suite in src/flash_loan/verification.rs that includes:

  • Overflow/Underflow Safety Proof: Proves that the fee calculation is safe for the entire valid range of i128 inputs.
  • Atomic Repayment Proof: Mathematically verifies that the loan can only succeed if the final balance is exactly initial_balance + fee, preventing any logic leaks.
  • Invariants: Verified that the calculated fee is always non-negative and proportional to the loan amount.

📝 Changes

  • Modified: src/flash_loan/lib.rs (Hardened logic & documentation)
  • Created: src/flash_loan/verification.rs (Formal proofs)
  • Created: implementation_plan.md (Detailed verification strategy)

✅ Verification Results

  • Unit Tests: All existing tests in src/flash_loan/tests.rs passed.
  • Kani Proofs: Verified that the contract logic remains safe under non-deterministic symbolic execution.

🔗 Related Issues

Fixes #126

- Added checked arithmetic to prevent overflow/underflow in fee calculations and repayment checks.
- Added Kani formal verification proofs in src/flash_loan/verification.rs.
- Proven atomic repayment enforcement and overflow safety.
- Verified reentrancy resistance due to stateless contract design.
- Added implementation plan and documentation.
@drips-wave
Copy link
Copy Markdown

drips-wave Bot commented Apr 28, 2026

@nuhumusamagaji Great news! 🎉 Based on an automated assessment of this PR, the linked Wave issue(s) no longer count against your application limits.

You can now already apply to more issues while waiting for a review of this PR. Keep up the great work! 🚀

Learn more about application limits

@nuhumusamagaji
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hello Maintainer, please review the PR as i have resolved the issue so i can get my point

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Contract: Formal Verification of Flash Loan Logic

1 participant