Skip to content

Conversation

jcstein
Copy link
Member

@jcstein jcstein commented Sep 18, 2025

Overview

@sysrex are these status pages actively maintained?

  1. Arabica shows partially degraded service. has that node's IP changed?
Screenshot 2025-09-18 at 11 45 34 2. [mocha](https://status.celestia.dev/status/mocha) shows no consensus nodes Screenshot 2025-09-18 at 11 46 13

@jcstein jcstein requested a review from sysrex September 18, 2025 17:46
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @jcstein, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the documentation by integrating direct links to the status pages for Celestia's Mainnet Beta, Arabica devnet, and Mocha testnet into the participate.md guide. This change aims to provide users with quick and easy access to the operational status of each network. The author also raises questions regarding the active maintenance and current state of the Arabica and Mocha status pages, highlighting potential discrepancies or issues that may require attention.

Highlights

  • Documentation Update: Added a link to the official Celestia Mainnet Beta status page within the how-to-guides/participate.md file, providing users with direct access to network health information.
  • Documentation Update: Incorporated a link to the official Celestia Arabica devnet status page in how-to-guides/participate.md, enhancing visibility into the devnet's operational status.
  • Documentation Update: Included a link to the official Celestia Mocha testnet status page in how-to-guides/participate.md, allowing users to easily monitor the testnet's condition.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds helpful links to the network status pages on the main participate.md page. My review includes suggestions to wrap these links in dedicated subheadings to improve the document's structure and maintain consistency with how status links are presented on other pages. This will make the information easier to find and the document easier to navigate.

Comment on lines +23 to +24
See the [official Celestia Mainnet Beta status page](https://status.celestia.dev/status/mainnet).

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

For better document structure and consistency with other pages like mainnet.md, it would be clearer to place this link under a dedicated heading.

Suggested change
See the [official Celestia Mainnet Beta status page](https://status.celestia.dev/status/mainnet).
### Network status
See the [official Celestia Mainnet Beta status page](https://status.celestia.dev/status/mainnet).

Comment on lines +41 to +42
See the [official Celestia Arabica devnet status page](https://status.celestia.dev/status/arabica).

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

To improve document structure and consistency, consider adding a dedicated heading for the status page link. Since "Arabica Devnet" is a level 3 heading, this new subheading should be level 4.

Suggested change
See the [official Celestia Arabica devnet status page](https://status.celestia.dev/status/arabica).
#### Network status
See the [official Celestia Arabica devnet status page](https://status.celestia.dev/status/arabica).

Comment on lines +55 to +56
See the [official Celestia Mocha testnet status page](https://status.celestia.dev/status/mocha).

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

For consistency with the other sections, this link should be placed under its own "Network status" heading. As "Mocha testnet" is a level 3 heading, the new subheading should be level 4 to maintain a logical document hierarchy.

Suggested change
See the [official Celestia Mocha testnet status page](https://status.celestia.dev/status/mocha).
#### Network status
See the [official Celestia Mocha testnet status page](https://status.celestia.dev/status/mocha).

@jcstein jcstein self-assigned this Sep 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant