Skip to content

Feature implementation from commits 643773c..7e049ee #4

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: feature-base-branch-2
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

codeOwlAI
Copy link
Owner

@codeOwlAI codeOwlAI commented Jun 29, 2025

PR Summary

Enhance Hooks with Optional Parameters and Optimize Data Flow

Overview

This PR updates several hooks to support optional parameters, improves data flow optimization, and fixes potential null pointer exceptions. It also updates documentation URLs and implements a new useDebounce hook.

Change Types

Type Description
Enhancement Added optional parameters to hooks for better flexibility
Feature Implemented new useDebounce hook for delayed value updates
Bugfix Added null checks to prevent potential exceptions
Refactor Optimized data flow in hooks with conditional processing
Docs Updated LexDAO and Kleros terms URLs to new documentation site

Affected Modules

Module / File Change Description
constants/src/config.ts Updated documentation URLs for LexDAO and Kleros terms
hooks/src/useDebounce.ts Implemented new React hook for value debouncing
hooks/src/useDetailsPin.ts Added null check for 'details' parameter
hooks/src/useEscrowZap.ts Refactored network configuration handling and milestone calculations
hooks/src/useFetchTokens.ts Added optional 'enabled' parameter for conditional execution
hooks/src/useInvoiceCreate.ts Added optional parameters and optimized details handling
hooks/src/useLock.ts Added support for optional 'details' parameter
hooks/src/useResolve.ts Added optional parameters and conditional error handling
utils/src/resolvers.ts Updated Yup validation schema dependency format

Notes for Reviewers

  • The hooks now support both direct 'details' objects and 'detailsHash' parameters
  • Loading state logic has been made more complex to account for different data sources
  • Error handling in useResolve now conditionally uses toast only when available

@@ -152,7 +156,7 @@ export const useEscrowZap = ({
status,
} = useSimulateContract({
chainId,
address: networkConfig[chainId].ZAP_ADDRESS ?? '0x0',
address: networkConfig?.ZAP_ADDRESS ?? '0x0',
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🐛 Correctness Issue

Chain-Specific Address Resolution Removed.

This change removes chainId-specific address lookup which will cause the contract to use incorrect addresses or fallback to '0x0'

Current Code (Diff):

-     address: networkConfig?.ZAP_ADDRESS ?? '0x0',
+     address: networkConfig[chainId]?.ZAP_ADDRESS ?? '0x0',
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Trust, but verify! 🕵️ Please review this suggestion with the care of a code archaeologist - check that it perfectly replaces the highlighted code, preserves all lines, maintains proper indentation, and won't break anything in production. Your future self will thank you! 🚀

Suggested change
address: networkConfig?.ZAP_ADDRESS ?? '0x0',
address: networkConfig[chainId]?.ZAP_ADDRESS ?? '0x0',

prepareLoading ||
writeLoading ||
waitingForTx ||
!(details || !detailsLoading),
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🐛 Correctness Issue

Complex Boolean Logic Creates Potential Loading State Bug.

The expression !(details || !detailsLoading) is unnecessarily complex and could lead to incorrect loading state determination which might cause UI inconsistencies.

Current Code (Diff):

-       !(details || !detailsLoading),
+       !details && detailsLoading,
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Trust, but verify! 🕵️ Please review this suggestion with the care of a code archaeologist - check that it perfectly replaces the highlighted code, preserves all lines, maintains proper indentation, and won't break anything in production. Your future self will thank you! 🚀

Suggested change
!(details || !detailsLoading),
!details && detailsLoading,

Comment on lines +143 to +145
onError: error => {
if (toast) errorToastHandler('useResolve', error, toast);
},
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🐛 Correctness Issue

Missing error logging for null toast case.

When toast is null, errors are silently ignored without any logging, potentially hiding critical failures in production.

Current Code (Diff):

-       onError: error => {
-         if (toast) errorToastHandler('useResolve', error, toast);
+       onError: error => {
+         if (toast) errorToastHandler('useResolve', error, toast);
+         else logError('useResolve', error);
       },
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Trust, but verify! 🕵️ Please review this suggestion with the care of a code archaeologist - check that it perfectly replaces the highlighted code, preserves all lines, maintains proper indentation, and won't break anything in production. Your future self will thank you! 🚀

Suggested change
onError: error => {
if (toast) errorToastHandler('useResolve', error, toast);
},
onError: error => {
if (toast) errorToastHandler('useResolve', error, toast);
else logError('useResolve', error);
},

prepareLoading ||
writeLoading ||
waitingForTx ||
!(details || !detailsLoading),
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🐛 Correctness Issue

Incorrect Loading State Logic.

The changed loading state logic using !(details || !detailsLoading) modifies the component's behavior and could cause UI inconsistencies.

Current Code (Diff):

-       !(details || !detailsLoading),
+       detailsLoading,
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Trust, but verify! 🕵️ Please review this suggestion with the care of a code archaeologist - check that it perfectly replaces the highlighted code, preserves all lines, maintains proper indentation, and won't break anything in production. Your future self will thank you! 🚀

Suggested change
!(details || !detailsLoading),
detailsLoading,

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants