V0.4.0/launch #8
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@gimlichael has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 32 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces version 0.4.0 of the Codebelt.SharedKernel package, expanding support to .NET 9 alongside .NET 8. It updates dependencies to their latest versions and modifies project files to manage package versions centrally. Additionally, it introduces a new target for preparing package release notes and adjusts the versioning scheme to use GitHub run numbers. The README and changelog are updated for clarity, while several test files are updated to reflect a change in the testing framework's namespace. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #8 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 88.50% 88.50%
=======================================
Files 11 11
Lines 200 200
Branches 8 8
=======================================
Hits 177 177
Misses 23 23 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
.nuget/Codebelt.SharedKernel/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1)
4-5: Consider improving the ALM section clarity.The current wording could be more specific and concise.
Consider this alternative:
# ALM -CHANGED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs +UPDATED Dependencies to align with .NET 8 and .NET 9 TFMs🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~5-~5: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...GED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs Version: 0.3.0 Availability: .NE...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)
README.md (3)
1-1: Align logo alt text with project title for consistencyConsider updating the alt text to match the full project title for better accessibility and consistent branding.
- +
Line range hint
3-30: Consider adding supported frameworks informationSince this release adds support for .NET 9 (as mentioned in PR objectives), consider adding a section or badge indicating supported .NET versions for better visibility.
Example addition:
+### Supported Frameworks +- .NET 9 +- .NET 8
31-33: Enhance contributing section's languageConsider these minor improvements to make the language more professional:
### Contributing to `Shared Kernel API by Codebelt` -Contributions](.github/CONTRIBUTING.md) are welcome and appreciated. - -Feel free to submit issues, feature requests, or pull requests to help improve this library. +[Contributions](.github/CONTRIBUTING.md) to this library are welcome and appreciated. + +We encourage you to submit issues, feature requests, or pull requests to help improve this library.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~32-~32: This verb does not appear to agree with the subject. Consider using a different form.
Context: ...Contributions](.github/CONTRIBUTING.md) are welcome and appreciated. Feel free to ...(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_AGREEMENT)
[style] ~33-~33: The phrase ‘feel free to’ is used quite frequently. Consider using a less frequent alternative to set your writing apart from others and make it sound more professional.
Context: ...UTING.md) are welcome and appreciated. Feel free to submit issues, feature requests, or pul...(FEEL_FREE_TO_STYLE_ME)
src/Codebelt.SharedKernel/Token.cs (2)
Line range hint
28-53: Consider improving validation readability and maintainabilityThe validation chain, while thorough, could benefit from some improvements:
- Consider extracting the validation logic into a separate method for better readability
- The character frequency validation logic could be simplified
Here's a suggested refactor:
public Token(string value, Action<TokenOptions> setup = null) : base(Validator.CheckParameter(value, () => { - Validator.ThrowIfInvalidConfigurator(setup, out var options); - Validator.ThrowIfNullOrWhitespace(value, message: "Value cannot be null, empty or consist only of white-space characters."); - Validator.ThrowIfLowerThan(value.Length, options.MinimumLength == 0 ? int.MinValue: options.MinimumLength, nameof(value), $"The minimum length of {nameof(value)} was not meet. {options.MinimumLength} characters are required."); - Validator.ThrowIfGreaterThan(value.Length, options.MaximumLength == 0 ? int.MaxValue: options.MaximumLength, nameof(value), $"The maximum length of {nameof(value)} was exceeded. {options.MaximumLength} characters are allowed."); - Validator.ThrowIfContainsAny(value, WhiteSpaceChars, message: $"White-space characters are not allowed inside {nameof(value)}."); - Validator.ThrowWhen(condition => condition.IsTrue((out string frequency) => - { - frequency = value.Distinct().Order().FromChars(); - return options.MaximumCharacterFrequency > 0 && frequency.Length <= options.MaximumCharacterFrequency; - }).Create(frequency => new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(nameof(value), DelimitedString.Create(frequency), $"Value suggest to high frequency of repeated characters. At least {options.MaximumCharacterFrequency} distinct characters are required.")).TryThrow()); + ValidateToken(value, setup); })) { } +private static void ValidateToken(string value, Action<TokenOptions> setup) +{ + Validator.ThrowIfInvalidConfigurator(setup, out var options); + ValidateBasicRequirements(value); + ValidateLength(value, options); + ValidateCharacterSet(value); + ValidateCharacterFrequency(value, options); +} + +private static void ValidateBasicRequirements(string value) +{ + Validator.ThrowIfNullOrWhitespace(value, message: "Value cannot be null, empty or consist only of white-space characters."); + Validator.ThrowIfContainsAny(value, WhiteSpaceChars, message: $"White-space characters are not allowed inside {nameof(value)}."); +} + +private static void ValidateLength(string value, TokenOptions options) +{ + var minLength = options.MinimumLength == 0 ? int.MinValue : options.MinimumLength; + var maxLength = options.MaximumLength == 0 ? int.MaxValue : options.MaximumLength; + + Validator.ThrowIfLowerThan(value.Length, minLength, nameof(value), + $"The minimum length of {nameof(value)} was not meet. {options.MinimumLength} characters are required."); + Validator.ThrowIfGreaterThan(value.Length, maxLength, nameof(value), + $"The maximum length of {nameof(value)} was exceeded. {options.MaximumLength} characters are allowed."); +} + +private static void ValidateCharacterFrequency(string value, TokenOptions options) +{ + if (options.MaximumCharacterFrequency <= 0) return; + + var distinctChars = value.Distinct().Count(); + if (distinctChars <= options.MaximumCharacterFrequency) + { + var frequency = value.Distinct().Order().FromChars(); + throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(nameof(value), DelimitedString.Create(frequency), + $"Value suggest to high frequency of repeated characters. At least {options.MaximumCharacterFrequency} distinct characters are required."); + } +}
Line range hint
11-17: Consider enhancing documentation with validation rules and examplesThe class is well-documented, but users would benefit from knowing the validation rules and seeing examples of valid/invalid tokens.
Add validation rules and examples to the class documentation:
/// <summary> /// Represents a <see cref="Token"/> object that encapsulates an immutable value used for identification or access control. /// </summary> /// <remarks>https://martinfowler.com/eaaCatalog/valueObject.html</remarks> +/// <remarks> +/// Validation rules: +/// - Must not be null, empty, or whitespace +/// - Must not contain any whitespace characters +/// - Length must be within configured minimum and maximum bounds +/// - Must have sufficient character variety based on configured frequency +/// +/// Examples: +/// Valid: "abc123", "token_123_xyz" +/// Invalid: "token with spaces", "aaaaaa" (insufficient character variety) +/// </remarks> /// <seealso cref="SingleValueObject{T}" />
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (19)
.nuget/Codebelt.SharedKernel/PackageReleaseNotes.txt(1 hunks)CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)Directory.Build.props(3 hunks)Directory.Build.targets(1 hunks)Directory.Packages.props(1 hunks)README.md(2 hunks)src/Codebelt.SharedKernel/Codebelt.SharedKernel.csproj(1 hunks)src/Codebelt.SharedKernel/Token.cs(1 hunks)test/Codebelt.SharedKernel.Tests/ClockSkewTest.cs(1 hunks)test/Codebelt.SharedKernel.Tests/Codebelt.SharedKernel.Tests.csproj(1 hunks)test/Codebelt.SharedKernel.Tests/CoordinatedUniversalTimeTest.cs(1 hunks)test/Codebelt.SharedKernel.Tests/CorrelationIdTest.cs(1 hunks)test/Codebelt.SharedKernel.Tests/Security/AccessKeyExtensionsTest.cs(1 hunks)test/Codebelt.SharedKernel.Tests/Security/AccessKeyOptionsTest.cs(1 hunks)test/Codebelt.SharedKernel.Tests/Security/AccessKeyTest.cs(1 hunks)test/Codebelt.SharedKernel.Tests/Security/SecretTest.cs(1 hunks)test/Codebelt.SharedKernel.Tests/TimeToLiveTest.cs(1 hunks)test/Codebelt.SharedKernel.Tests/TokenTest.cs(1 hunks)testenvironments.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (10)
- Directory.Packages.props
- src/Codebelt.SharedKernel/Codebelt.SharedKernel.csproj
- test/Codebelt.SharedKernel.Tests/Codebelt.SharedKernel.Tests.csproj
- test/Codebelt.SharedKernel.Tests/CoordinatedUniversalTimeTest.cs
- test/Codebelt.SharedKernel.Tests/CorrelationIdTest.cs
- test/Codebelt.SharedKernel.Tests/Security/AccessKeyExtensionsTest.cs
- test/Codebelt.SharedKernel.Tests/Security/AccessKeyOptionsTest.cs
- test/Codebelt.SharedKernel.Tests/TimeToLiveTest.cs
- test/Codebelt.SharedKernel.Tests/TokenTest.cs
- testenvironments.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
.nuget/Codebelt.SharedKernel/PackageReleaseNotes.txt
[style] ~5-~5: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...GED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs Version: 0.3.0 Availability: .NE...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)
README.md
[uncategorized] ~32-~32: This verb does not appear to agree with the subject. Consider using a different form.
Context: ...Contributions](.github/CONTRIBUTING.md) are welcome and appreciated. Feel free to ...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_AGREEMENT)
[style] ~33-~33: The phrase ‘feel free to’ is used quite frequently. Consider using a less frequent alternative to set your writing apart from others and make it sound more professional.
Context: ...UTING.md) are welcome and appreciated. Feel free to submit issues, feature requests, or pul...
(FEEL_FREE_TO_STYLE_ME)
🪛 Markdownlint
CHANGELOG.md
9-9: Expected: h3; Actual: h4
Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
(MD001, heading-increment)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
Directory.Build.targets (2)
Line range hint 6-15: LGTM! Well-structured release notes preparation.
The implementation correctly handles release notes preparation by:
- Reading from a centralized location
- Applying proper line breaks
- Running only for non-test projects
- Checking file existence
17-18: LGTM! Proper migration to GitHub Actions.
The changes correctly handle the transition from Azure DevOps to GitHub Actions by:
- Setting a default value of 0 for local builds
- Maintaining the same version format
Let's verify that no references to BUILD_BUILDNUMBER remain:
✅ Verification successful
Migration to GitHub Actions is complete and clean
After thorough verification of all build-related files:
- No references to
BUILD_BUILDNUMBERor other Azure DevOps specific variables were found - No Azure Pipelines configuration files exist in the repository
- The
GITHUB_RUN_NUMBERimplementation in Directory.Build.targets is properly configured with a default value for local builds
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to BUILD_BUILDNUMBER
# Expect: No matches as we've migrated to GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER
# Search for BUILD_BUILDNUMBER in all files
rg "BUILD_BUILDNUMBER" --type-add 'props:*.props' --type-add 'targets:*.targets'
# Also check for any Azure DevOps specific files that might need updating
fd -e yml -e yaml | xargs rg "BUILD_BUILDNUMBER"
Length of output: 129
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify more thoroughly by:
# 1. First check what build-related files exist
# 2. Then examine their contents for any Azure DevOps references
# 3. Also look for any Azure Pipelines files
# List all build-related files
echo "=== Build Files ==="
fd "Directory.Build"
fd "\.props$|\.targets$"
# Show contents of build files
echo -e "\n=== Build File Contents ==="
fd "Directory.Build|\.props$|\.targets$" -t f -X cat
# Check for Azure Pipelines files
echo -e "\n=== Azure Pipeline Files ==="
fd "azure-pipelines"
Length of output: 6178
.nuget/Codebelt.SharedKernel/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1)
1-2: LGTM! Version and availability declaration is clear and accurate.
The version bump and framework support are clearly documented, following the established format.
test/Codebelt.SharedKernel.Tests/Security/AccessKeyTest.cs (2)
3-3: Verify feature parity in the new testing framework.
Since we're transitioning from Cuemon.Extensions.Xunit to Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit, please ensure that all testing features used in this test class (and others) are supported by the new framework.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential testing features that might need verification
# Look for testing attributes and assertions used in test files
echo "Checking test features in use..."
rg "\[Fact\]|\[Theory\]|Assert\.|ITestOutputHelper" "test/"
# Check the new framework's test base class
echo "Checking base Test class features..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class Test {
$$$
}'3-3: LGTM! Verify consistent namespace updates across test files.
The namespace change from Cuemon.Extensions.Xunit to Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit aligns with the PR objectives.
✅ Verification successful
✅ Namespace changes are consistent across all test files
The verification confirms that:
- No references to the old
Cuemon.Extensions.Xunitnamespace remain - All test files that inherit from
Testclass are using the newCodebelt.Extensions.Xunitnamespace - The namespace change has been applied consistently across all 9 test files
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all test files have been updated to use the new namespace
# Check for any remaining references to the old namespace
echo "Checking for any remaining references to Cuemon.Extensions.Xunit..."
rg "using Cuemon.Extensions.Xunit" "test/"
# Check that all test files using the base Test class have the new namespace
echo "Verifying all test files have been updated..."
rg -l "class \w+Test : Test" "test/" | xargs rg "using Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit"
Length of output: 22683
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the namespace changes more thoroughly
# Check for any remaining references to the old namespace
echo "Checking for any remaining references to Cuemon.Extensions.Xunit..."
rg "Cuemon\.Extensions\.Xunit" "test/"
# Check all test files that inherit from Test class
echo "Checking test files inheriting from Test class..."
rg "class \w+Test : Test" "test/" -l
# Check the imports in these test files
echo "Checking imports in test files..."
rg "^using.*Extensions\.Xunit" "test/"
Length of output: 1774
test/Codebelt.SharedKernel.Tests/ClockSkewTest.cs (2)
Line range hint 1-99: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage with well-structured test cases.
The test implementation provides thorough coverage of the ClockSkew functionality including comparisons, factory methods, and serialization. The tests are focused, well-named, and follow good testing practices.
3-3: Verify the test framework migration.
The change from Cuemon.Extensions.Xunit to Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit appears to be part of a broader migration. The test class continues to inherit from Test, suggesting similar functionality is maintained.
Let's verify the consistency of this change across the test suite and ensure the Test base class is available in the new namespace:
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate another verification script to check the actual test class implementations since the ast-grep pattern might need adjustment.
Migration to Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit is consistent across the test suite
The verification shows:
- No remaining references to
Cuemon.Extensions.Xunit - All test files consistently use
Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit - All test classes properly inherit from the
Testbase class - The migration is complete and uniform across all test files in the repository
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent usage of the new test framework across all test files
# and confirm the availability of the Test base class.
# Check if any files still use the old namespace
echo "Checking for any remaining usage of Cuemon.Extensions.Xunit:"
rg "using Cuemon\.Extensions\.Xunit" "test"
# Verify the new namespace is used consistently
echo -e "\nVerifying consistent usage of Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit:"
rg "using Codebelt\.Extensions\.Xunit" "test"
# Look for Test base class usage to ensure it's properly referenced
echo -e "\nVerifying Test base class usage:"
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ : Test'
Length of output: 1282
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check test class implementations to verify inheritance
echo "Checking test class implementations:"
rg "class.*Test.*:.*Test" test -A 1
# Also check for potential variations in base class usage
echo -e "\nChecking for other potential base class patterns:"
rg "class.*Test.*:" test -A 1
Length of output: 3229
src/Codebelt.SharedKernel/Token.cs (1)
42-42: Verify the behavior of Validator.ThrowIfContainsAny
The change from Validator.ThrowIf.ContainsAny to Validator.ThrowIfContainsAny appears to be a correction in the validation method call. Since this validation is crucial for token security (preventing whitespace in tokens), we should verify that the new method maintains the same validation guarantees.
✅ Verification successful
Change from ThrowIf.ContainsAny to ThrowIfContainsAny is safe and well-tested
The validation behavior is thoroughly tested in TokenTest.cs with specific test cases:
Constructor_ShouldThrowArgumentException_WhenValueIsWhitespacetests for pure whitespace valuesConstructor_ShouldThrowArgumentOutOfRangeException_WhenValueContainsNonAsciiValuestests for embedded whitespace characters- Test data is comprehensively generated using
WhitespaceCharacterstheory data
The change maintains the same validation guarantees and is consistent with other validation method calls in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the validation behavior and test coverage
# Check if there are tests covering this validation
rg -A 5 "ThrowIfContainsAny.*WhiteSpaceChars" test/
# Look for other usages of this validation method to ensure consistent usage
rg "ThrowIfContainsAny" src/
# Check if there are any remaining usages of the old method
rg "ThrowIf\.ContainsAny" src/
Length of output: 292
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the validation behavior more thoroughly
# Check the Token class implementation to understand the validation context
rg -A 10 "class Token" src/
# Look for test files related to Token
fd -e cs -e fs Token.*test test/
# Check for any unit test classes that might test Token
rg -l "Token.*Test" test/
# Check if there are any other validation methods being used
rg "Validator\.ThrowIf" src/
Length of output: 3619
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the test implementation to verify validation coverage
# Check the Token test implementation
cat test/Codebelt.SharedKernel.Tests/TokenTest.cs
# Check if there are any test methods specifically for whitespace validation
rg -A 5 "WhiteSpace.*Token" test/
Length of output: 5075
Directory.Build.props (3)
62-74: Verify test framework transition and package availability
The switch from Cuemon to Codebelt testing extensions is a significant change. Please ensure:
- All test functionality is preserved in the new package
- The new package is published and accessible
- Test configurations are updated accordingly
Let's verify the test framework transition:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify test framework changes
# Check for any remaining Cuemon references
rg "Cuemon.Extensions.Xunit" -t cs -t csproj
# Check if the new package is properly referenced in test projects
fd -e csproj | xargs grep -l "Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit"
# Look for potential test configuration files
fd -e json -e config | xargs grep -l "Xunit"42-43: Verify version constraints in Directory.Packages.props
The removal of version numbers aligns with centralized version management. Please ensure:
- These packages are properly versioned in Directory.Packages.props
- MinVer configuration is compatible with the new versioning scheme using GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER
Let's verify the version management:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify package version management
# Check if versions are defined in Directory.Packages.props
cat Directory.Packages.props | grep -A 2 "Microsoft.SourceLink.GitHub\|MinVer"
# Check MinVer configuration
fd -e props -e targets . | xargs grep -l "MinVerTagPrefix\|MinVerVerbosity"15-15: Verify .NET 9 preview compatibility and CI pipeline support
Adding .NET 9 support is forward-looking, but since it's currently in preview, please ensure:
- All dependencies are compatible with .NET 9
- CI pipeline has .NET 9 SDK installed
- Production deployment considerations are documented
Let's verify the dependencies compatibility:
Also applies to: 49-49
test/Codebelt.SharedKernel.Tests/Security/SecretTest.cs (2)
5-5: Verify test behavior remains consistent
The test class inherits from Test and uses various test attributes. Let's ensure the behavior of these components remains identical after switching to Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any breaking changes in test attributes or base class usage
rg -A 2 "using Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit" --type cs | rg -A 5 "class.*Test.*:"
# Verify consistent usage of ITestOutputHelper across test files
rg "ITestOutputHelper.*output.*base.*output" --type csAlso applies to: 15-15
3-3: Verify complete transition from Cuemon to Codebelt namespace
While the Xunit extensions import has been updated to use Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit, there's still a reference to the Cuemon namespace. Let's verify if this remaining reference is intentional or if it should also be migrated.
Also applies to: 5-5
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml (1)
Line range hint
35-38: Verify preview .NET SDK requirement.The .NET installation step includes preview versions (
includePreview: true). While this is necessary for .NET 9 preview, consider adding a comment explaining this requirement for future maintenance.Consider documenting this requirement in the workflow file:
- name: Install .NET uses: codebeltnet/install-dotnet@v1 with: + # Required for .NET 9 preview support includePreview: true🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 27-27: too few spaces after comma
(commas)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml
[warning] 27-27: too few spaces after comma
(commas)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml (2)
Line range hint 9-17: LGTM: Well-structured workflow input configuration!
The configuration input parameter is properly implemented with appropriate validation, default value, and clear description. It effectively controls the build configuration during manual workflow runs.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 27-27: too few spaces after comma
(commas)
27-27: Fix formatting and verify framework compatibility.
The framework matrix update correctly includes both .NET 9 and .NET 8 support, but has a minor formatting issue.
Apply this formatting fix:
- framework: [net9.0,net8.0]
+ framework: [net9.0, net8.0]Let's verify the .NET SDK compatibility in the workflow:
✅ Verification successful
Framework matrix update is compatible with the workflow setup
The workflow uses codebeltnet/install-dotnet@v1 action with includePreview: true, which ensures compatibility with .NET 9 preview. The framework matrix update is correctly configured to support both .NET 9.0 and .NET 8.0.
Only formatting needs to be fixed:
- framework: [net9.0,net8.0]
+ framework: [net9.0, net8.0]🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify .NET SDK installation steps compatibility with net9.0
# Look for .NET SDK version specifications in workflow files
rg -l "dotnet" .github/workflows/ | xargs rg "dotnet-version|framework-version|version:"
Length of output: 257
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the setup-dotnet action usage and SDK version specifications
rg -A 3 "setup-dotnet|uses:.*dotnet" .github/workflows/
Length of output: 3913
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 27-27: too few spaces after comma
(commas)
gimlichael
had a problem deploying
to
Production
GitHub Actions
Failure
|
This pull request includes several updates to the project, focusing on dependency management, target framework updates, and documentation improvements. The most important changes include updating target frameworks to support .NET 9, centralizing package version management, and updating dependencies to their latest versions.
Dependency and Target Framework Updates:
Directory.Build.propsfor both main and test projects. [1] [2] [3]Directory.Packages.propsto ensure consistent versions across the project.Documentation Updates:
README.mdto reflect the new project name and improve contribution guidelines. [1] [2]CHANGELOG.mdandPackageReleaseNotes.txt. [1] [2]Code Improvements:
Token.csto useValidator.ThrowIfContainsAnyinstead ofValidator.ThrowIf.ContainsAny.Codebelt.Extensions.Xunitinstead ofCuemon.Extensions.Xunit. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]Build Configuration:
Directory.Build.targetsto useGITHUB_RUN_NUMBERfor file versioning instead ofBUILD_BUILDNUMBER.testenvironments.jsonto support the latest .NET versions.Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes for Version 0.4.0
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores
These updates enhance the functionality and maintainability of the project while ensuring compatibility with the latest .NET frameworks.