Skip to content

chore(CR-29164): updated node.js, debian, jsonpath-plus, tar-fs, kubectl, brace-expansion #883

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension


Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion .nvmrc
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1 +1 @@
v22.11.0
v22.16.0
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions Dockerfile
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -11,10 +11,10 @@ RUN pip install yq==${YQ_VERSION}
RUN pyinstaller --noconfirm --onefile --log-level DEBUG --clean --distpath /tmp/ $(which yq)

# kubectl binary
FROM bitnami/kubectl:1.30.6 AS kubectl
FROM bitnami/kubectl:1.33.1 AS kubectl

# Main
FROM node:22.11.0-alpine3.20
FROM node:22.16.0-alpine3.22
RUN apk --update add --no-cache \
bash \
ca-certificates \
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions Dockerfile-debian
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -11,10 +11,10 @@ RUN pip install yq==${YQ_VERSION}
RUN pyinstaller --noconfirm --onefile --log-level DEBUG --clean --distpath /tmp/ $(which yq)

# kubectl binary
FROM bitnami/kubectl:1.30.6 as kubectl
FROM bitnami/kubectl:1.33.1 as kubectl

# Main
FROM node:22.11.0-bullseye-slim
FROM node:22.16.0-bookworm-slim
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does bullseye and bookworm provide the same list of binaries, including versions?
If not, it will affect customer's pipelines.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

which binaries we are talking about?

RUN apt update \
&& apt -y install \
apt-transport-https \
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions Dockerfile-debian-rootless
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -11,10 +11,10 @@ RUN pip install yq==${YQ_VERSION}
RUN pyinstaller --noconfirm --onefile --log-level DEBUG --clean --distpath /tmp/ $(which yq)

# kubectl binary
FROM bitnami/kubectl:1.30.6 as kubectl
FROM bitnami/kubectl:1.33.1 as kubectl

# Main
FROM node:22.11.0-bullseye-slim
FROM node:22.16.0-bookworm-slim
RUN apt update \
&& apt -y install \
bash \
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions Dockerfile-rootless
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -11,10 +11,10 @@ RUN pip install yq==${YQ_VERSION}
RUN pyinstaller --noconfirm --onefile --log-level DEBUG --clean --distpath /tmp/ $(which yq)

# kubectl binary
FROM bitnami/kubectl:1.30.6 as kubectl
FROM bitnami/kubectl:1.33.1 as kubectl

# Main
FROM node:22.11.0-alpine3.20
FROM node:22.16.0-alpine3.22
RUN apk --update add --no-cache \
bash \
ca-certificates \
Expand Down
5 changes: 3 additions & 2 deletions package.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{
"name": "codefresh",
"version": "0.89.1",
"version": "0.89.2",
"description": "Codefresh command line utility",
"main": "index.js",
"preferGlobal": true,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -42,7 +42,8 @@
"json-schema": "^0.4.0",
"ansi-regex": "^5.0.1",
"kubernetes-client/@kubernetes/client-node": ">=0.22.2",
"tough-cookie": "^4.1.3"
"tough-cookie": "^4.1.3",
"openid-client": "^4.9.0"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Which deps are requiring it?
I see that it was present twice, should we not only upgrade lower version but also downgrade newer one? How safe is that?

Image

Copy link
Author

@vitalii-codefresh vitalii-codefresh Jul 8, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

image

the same solution in kube-integration
image

},
"dependencies": {
"@codefresh-io/docker-reference": "^0.0.5",
Expand Down
Loading