Skip to content

Custom self client validation for 08 wasm tendermint clients #5858

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

chatton
Copy link
Contributor

@chatton chatton commented Feb 19, 2024

Description

Co-Authored-By: @charleenfei

I added a script and makefile target to locally build the wasm simapp to make it easier to test modifications.

closes: #5853

Commit Message / Changelog Entry

type: commit message

see the guidelines for commit messages. (view raw markdown for examples)


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against the correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md).
  • Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards and Go style guide.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests.
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/).
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Provide a commit message to be used for the changelog entry in the PR description for review.
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer.
  • Review Codecov Report in the comment section below once CI passes.

@chatton chatton changed the base branch from damian/cian/custom-validate-self-client to feat/rollkit February 19, 2024 12:40
@charleenfei charleenfei marked this pull request as ready for review February 19, 2024 15:16
@chatton chatton merged commit a7ce91d into feat/rollkit Feb 19, 2024
@chatton chatton deleted the charly/issue#5853-custom-self-client-validation-for-08-wasm-tendermint-clients branch February 19, 2024 15:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants