Skip to content

Conversation

@cyxer000
Copy link

@cyxer000 cyxer000 commented Sep 16, 2025

Description

Add comprehensive unit tests for the Process enum class to improve test coverage.

Changes

  • Created tests/test_process.py with 12 unit tests
  • Tests cover all aspects of the Process enum functionality
  • Ensures enum behavior is properly validated

Type of Change

  • Tests (adding missing tests)
  • Non-breaking change

Testing

  • All new tests pass successfully
  • No existing tests were broken
  • Tests run in ~1.5 seconds

Benefits

  • Improves overall test coverage
  • Validates core Process enum behavior
  • Prevents regression in enum functionality

Add unit tests for the Process enum class including:
- Enum type and inheritance validation
- Value correctness and string representation
- Comparison and iteration functionality
- Membership and hash operations
- Error handling for invalid values
- Immutability enforcement

This improves test coverage for the core Process enum component.
cursor[bot]

This comment was marked as outdated.

Fixed inconsistent assertions in Process enum string representation tests.
The tests now correctly demonstrate that:
- str(Process.sequential) returns 'Process.sequential' (qualified name)
- Process.sequential == 'sequential' (direct string comparison works)
- Added comprehensive string enum behavior tests
- Clarified the distinction between str() and .value

This ensures tests accurately reflect Python's string enum behavior.
@greysonlalonde
Copy link
Contributor

Hey! much appreciated about the care for testing, but I'm not sure we need to test inbuilt python functionality like enums.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants