Upgrade datafusion and datafusion-federation #324
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
trueleo
reviewed
Apr 24, 2025
ahirner
added a commit
to ahirner/datafusion-table-providers
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2025
…into upgrade_datafusion related to datafusion-contrib#324
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The most recent version of
datafusionbrings several fixes to the unparse of logical plans, which affectdatafusion-table-providerswhen optimizing plans withdatafusion-federation, such as apache/datafusion#15693 and apache/datafusion#15212.The only thing missing for this PR to work is updating the
arrowversion in theduckdb-rscrate (there is already an open PR: duckdb/duckdb-rs#496).