Skip to content

Conversation

@stasadev
Copy link
Member

@stasadev stasadev commented Mar 11, 2025

The Issue

How This PR Solves The Issue

  • Uses Debian 12 microsoft repo.
  • Adds upstream ddev-addon-template changes.
  • Adds non-documented DDEV_IGNORE_ARCH_CHECK=true ddev add-on get ... to bypass arch check.
    (If someone needs to find it, they should do it themselves.)

Manual Testing Instructions

ddev add-on get https://github.com/ddev/ddev-sqlsrv/tarball/20250311_stasadev_debian12
ddev restart

Automated Testing Overview

Related Issue Link(s)

Release/Deployment Notes

@stasadev stasadev changed the title feat: upgrade Dockerfile to Debian 12, fixes #24 feat: upgrade Dockerfile to Debian 12, update add-on files from upstream, fixes #24 Mar 11, 2025
@rfay
Copy link
Member

rfay commented Mar 11, 2025

Wow!

@stasadev
Copy link
Member Author

Maybe this PR will fix the situation on Rosetta as well, but I'm not sure 😅.

@kdambekalns, this PR replaces your two PRs. (I hope you're not upset about this, I didn't use your code anyway).

@stasadev stasadev changed the title feat: upgrade Dockerfile to Debian 12, update add-on files from upstream, fixes #24 feat: upgrade Dockerfile to Debian 12, update add-on files from upstream, fixes #24, fixes #35 Apr 10, 2025
@stasadev stasadev changed the title feat: upgrade Dockerfile to Debian 12, update add-on files from upstream, fixes #24, fixes #35 feat: upgrade Dockerfile to Debian 12, update add-on files from upstream, fixes #24, fixes #35, fixes #33 Apr 10, 2025
@stasadev stasadev changed the title feat: upgrade Dockerfile to Debian 12, update add-on files from upstream, fixes #24, fixes #35, fixes #33 feat: upgrade Dockerfile to Debian 12, update add-on files from upstream, fixes #24, fixes #33, fixes #35 Apr 10, 2025
@stasadev stasadev merged commit cddb929 into main Apr 10, 2025
2 checks passed
@stasadev stasadev deleted the 20250311_stasadev_debian12 branch April 10, 2025 18:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants