Discord's application commands should be stored in a Collection #1417
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request makes improvements to the way registered slash commands are managed within the
Discordclass. The main changes involve updating the type annotation for the$application_commandsproperty and initializing it with a proper collection in the constructor.Improvements to slash command management:
$application_commandsproperty in theDiscordclass to specify it can be anExCollectionInterface<RegisteredCommand>or an array ofRegisteredCommandobjects, providing better clarity and type safety.$application_commandsproperty in theDiscordclass constructor usingCollection::for(RegisteredCommand::class, 'name'), ensuring it is always a properly structured collection.